Bridge Girth: A Unifying Notion in Network Design
Greg Bodwin, Gary Hoppenworth, Ohad Trabelsi
Abstract
A classic 1993 paper by Althöfer et al. proved a tight reduction from spanners, emulators, and distance oracles to the extremal function of high-girth graphs. This paper initiated a large body of work in network design, in which problems are attacked by reduction to or the analogous extremal function for other girth concepts. In this paper, we introduce and study a new girth concept that we call the bridge girth of path systems, and we show that it can be used to significantly expand and improve this web of connections between girth problems and network design. We prove two kinds of results:•We write the maximum possible size of an n-node, p-path system with bridge girth as , and we write a certain variant for “ordered” path systems as . We identify several arguments in the literature that implicitly show upper or lower bounds on , and we provide some polynomial improvements to these bounds. In particular, we construct a tight lower bound for , and we polynomially improve the upper bounds for and .•We show that many state-of-the-art results in network design can be recovered or improved via black-box reductions to or . Examples include bounds for distance/reachability preservers, exact hopsets, shortcut sets, the flow-cut gaps for directed multicut and sparsest cut, an integrality gap for directed Steiner forest.We believe that the concept of bridge girth can lead to a stronger and more organized map of the research area. Towards this, we leave many open problems related to both bridge girth reductions and extremal bounds on the size of path systems with high bridge girth.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a7c10ba0-410b-44a5-8fd9-ad393c8d9d54Cited by top-tier papers3
- Folklore Sampling is Optimal for Exact Hopsets: Confirming the √n BarrierGreg Bodwin, Gary HoppenworthFOCS 2023 · 2 citations
- Path-Reporting Distance Oracles with Logarithmic Stretch and Size O(n log log n)Michael Elkin, Idan ShabatFOCS 2023 · 1 citation
- Improved Online Reachability PreserversGreg Bodwin, Tuong LeSODA 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on8
- New (α, β) Spanners and HopsetsUri Ben-Levy, Merav ParterSODA 2020 · 10 citations
- A Deterministic Parallel APSP Algorithm and its ApplicationsAdam Karczmarz, Piotr SankowskiSODA 2021 · 9 citations
- Partially Optimal Edge Fault-Tolerant SpannersGreg Bodwin, Michael Dinitz, Caleb RobelleSODA 2022 · 8 citations
- New Diameter-Reducing Shortcuts and Directed Hopsets: Breaking the BarrierShimon Kogan, Merav ParterSODA 2022 · 7 citations
- Having Hope in Hops: New Spanners, Preservers and Lower Bounds for HopsetsShimon Kogan, Merav ParterFOCS 2022 · 5 citations
Related papers
- New Separations and Reductions for Directed Hopsets and PreserversGary Hoppenworth, Yinzhan Xu, Zixuan XuSODA 2025 · 2 citations
- Better Lower Bounds for Shortcut Sets and Additive Spanners via an Improved Alternation ProductKevin Lu, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Nicole Wein, Zixuan XuSODA 2022 · 6 citations
- Closing the Gap Between Directed Hopsets and Shortcut SetsAaron Bernstein, Nicole WeinSODA 2023 · 3 citations
- Tree embeddings for hop-constrained network designBernhard Haeupler, D. Ellis Hershkowitz, Goran ZuzicSTOC 2021 · 1 citation
- Simpler and Higher Lower Bounds for Shortcut SetsVirginia Vassilevska Williams, Yinzhan Xu, Zixuan XuSODA 2024 · 2 citations
