Simpler and Higher Lower Bounds for Shortcut Sets
Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Yinzhan Xu, Zixuan Xu
Abstract
We study the well-known shortcut set problem: how much can one decrease the diameter of a directed graph by adding a small set of shortcuts from the transitive closure of the graph.
We provide a variety of lower bounds. First, we vastly simplify the recent construction of Bodwin and Hoppenworth [FOCS 2023] which showed an Ω(n 1/4 ) lower bound for the diameter of a directed unweighted n-node graph after adding O(n) shortcut edges. We highlight that our simplification completely removes the use of the convex sets by Bárány and Larman [Math. Ann. 1998] used in all previous lower bound constructions. Our simplification also removes the need for randomness and further removes some log factors. It allows us to generalize the construction to higher dimensions, which in turn can be used to show the following results:
• There is an Ω(n 1/5 ) lower bound for the diameter of the graph after adding O(m) shortcuts, where m denotes the number of edges in the input graph.
• For all ε > 0, there exists a δ > 0 such that there are n-vertex O(n)-edge graphs G where adding any shortcut set of size O(n 2-ε ) keeps the diameter of G at Ω(n δ ). This improves the sparsity of the constructed graph compared to a known similar result by Hesse [SODA 2003].
• For any integer d ≥ 2, there exists a graph G = (V, E) on n vertices and S ⊆ V with |S| = Θ(n 3/(d+3) ), such that when adding O(n) or O(m) shortcuts, the sourcewise diameter (the largest distance from some vertex in S to some reachable vertex in the graph) is Ω(|S| 1/3 ). This initiates the study of sourcewise diameter in the setting of the shortcut set problem; previously, the study of the sourcewise variant is popular in a wide variety of related problems such as spanners and distance preservers. Complementing this lower bound result, we also provide an upper bound: we show that, we can reduce the sourcewise diameter to O( |S|) by adding O(n) shortcut edges.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Covering Approximate Shortest Paths with DAGsSepehr Assadi, Gary Hoppenworth, Nicole WeinSTOC 2025 · 1 citation
- Reviving Thorup's Shortcut ConjectureAaron Bernstein, Henry L. Fleischmann, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Bernhard Haeupler et al.STOC 2026 · 1 citation
- Shortcuts and Transitive-Closure Spanners ApproximationParinya Chalermsook, Yonggang Jiang, Sagnik Mukhopadhyay, Danupon NanongkaiSODA 2026
Builds on9
- Parallel approximate undirected shortest paths via low hop emulatorsAlexandr Andoni, Clifford Stein, Peilin ZhongSTOC 2020 · 50 citations
- Near-Optimal Decremental SSSP in Dense Weighted DigraphsAaron Bernstein, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Christian Wulff-NilsenFOCS 2020 · 16 citations
- Efficient construction of directed hopsets and parallel approximate shortest pathsNairen Cao, Jeremy T. Fineman, Katina RussellSTOC 2020 · 13 citations
- A Deterministic Parallel APSP Algorithm and its ApplicationsAdam Karczmarz, Piotr SankowskiSODA 2021 · 9 citations
- New Diameter-Reducing Shortcuts and Directed Hopsets: Breaking the BarrierShimon Kogan, Merav ParterSODA 2022 · 7 citations
Related papers
- Closing the Gap Between Directed Hopsets and Shortcut SetsAaron Bernstein, Nicole WeinSODA 2023 · 3 citations
- Faster and Unified Algorithms for Diameter Reducing Shortcuts and Minimum Chain CoversShimon Kogan, Merav ParterSODA 2023 · 1 citation
- Folklore Sampling is Optimal for Exact Hopsets: Confirming the √n BarrierGreg Bodwin, Gary HoppenworthFOCS 2023 · 2 citations
- New Separations and Reductions for Directed Hopsets and PreserversGary Hoppenworth, Yinzhan Xu, Zixuan XuSODA 2025 · 2 citations
- Having Hope in Hops: New Spanners, Preservers and Lower Bounds for HopsetsShimon Kogan, Merav ParterFOCS 2022 · 5 citations
