Decoder Tuning: Efficient Language Understanding as Decoding
Ganqu Cui, Wentao Li, Ning Ding, Longtao Huang, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
Abstract
With the evergrowing sizes of pre-trained models (PTMs), it has been an emerging practice to only provide the inference APIs for users, namely model-as-a-service (MaaS) setting. To adapt PTMs with model parameters frozen, most current approaches focus on the input side, seeking for powerful prompts to stimulate models for correct answers. However, we argue that input-side adaptation could be arduous due to the lack of gradient signals and they usually require thousands of API queries, resulting in high computation and time costs. In light of this, we present Decoder Tuning (DecT), which in contrast optimizes task-specific decoder networks on the output side. Specifically, DecT first extracts prompt-stimulated output scores for initial predictions. On top of that, we train an additional decoder network on the output representations to incorporate posterior data knowledge. By gradientbased optimization, DecT can be trained within several seconds and requires only one PTM query per sample. Empirically, we conduct extensive natural language understanding experiments and show that DecT significantly outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms with a 200× speed-up. Our codes are available at https://github.com/thunlp/DecT .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space SteeringSheng Liu, Haotian Ye, Lei Xing, James Y. ZouICML 2024 · 244 citations
- Batch Calibration: Rethinking Calibration for In-Context Learning and Prompt EngineeringHan Zhou, Xingchen Wan, Lev Proleev, Diana Mincu et al.ICLR 2024 · 90 citations
- CRaSh: Clustering, Removing, and Sharing Enhance Fine-tuning without Full Large Language ModelKaiyan Zhang, Ning Ding, Biqing Qi, Xuekai Zhu et al.EMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
Builds on12
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order SensitivityYao Lu, Max Bartolo, Alastair Moore, Sebastian Riedel et al.ACL 2022 · 1,494 citations
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
- Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuningTianyi Zhang, Felix Wu, Arzoo Katiyar, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2021 · 172 citations
- RLPrompt: Optimizing Discrete Text Prompts with Reinforcement LearningMingkai Deng, Jianyu Wang, Cheng-Ping Hsieh, Yihan Wang et al.EMNLP 2022 · 141 citations
Related papers
- Black-Box Tuning for Language-Model-as-a-ServiceTianxiang Sun, Yunfan Shao, Hong Qian, Xuanjing Huang et al.ICML 2022 · 343 citations
- ADePT: Adaptive Decomposed Prompt Tuning for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningPengwei Tang, Xiaolin Hu, Yong LiuICLR 2025
- Distribution-Aligned Decoding for Efficient LLM Task AdaptationSenkang Hu, Xudong Han, Jinqi Jiang, Yihang Tao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Skip Tuning: Pre-trained Vision-Language Models are Effective and Efficient Adapters ThemselvesShihan Wu, Ji Zhang, Pengpeng Zeng, Lianli Gao et al.CVPR 2025
- DeMPT: Decoding-enhanced Multi-phase Prompt Tuning for Making LLMs Be Better Context-aware TranslatorsXinglin Lyu, Junhui Li, Yanqing Zhao, Min Zhang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
