Lune

EMNLP Findings2025

PrAd: Prompt Adaptive Tuning for Decoder-only Language Models

Youneng Ma, Junyi He, Haojun Fei

Abstract

Fine tuning pretrained language models for downstream NLP tasks, while effective, can be costly when the model size and the number of tasks increase, as it requires full parameter updates and a separate model served for each task. Parameter-efficient tuning (PET) addresses the issue by keeping the pretrained parameters fixed while introducing minimal task-specific parameters. There are two essential PET paradigms: prompt-based tuning and adapter-based tuning, each with distinct limitations. Prompt-based methods suffer from increased input lengths and sensitivity to weight initialization, whereas adapter approaches can substantially increase inference time. To overcome these limitations, we propose prompt adaptive tuning (PrAd), a general prompt-based tuning framework for decodeonly models that delivers strong performance with high efficiency, even in multi-task scenarios. Unlike conventional prompt-based tuning which uses soft tokens to "wrap" inputs, PrAd employs adapters for flexible input transformation. While traditional adapter-based tuning adapts both the prompt and decoded tokens, PrAd only adapts the prompt. PrAd enables the creation of diverse prompt-based approaches while providing critical advantages for realworld use: (1) it can maintain original input lengths with easy initialization during training, like adapter-based methods; (2) it can reduce management costs while facilitating deployment and efficient batch inference of different tasks, like prompt-based tuning.; and (3) it introduces no additional inference latency in the decoding phase even when serving multiple tasks concurrently. Experiments on six diverse tasks demonstrate that PrAd can consistently attain comparable or better performance and higher inference efficiency.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Builds on14

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
  2. LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
  3. Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context LearningHaokun Liu, Derek Tam, Mohammed Muqeeth, Jay Mohta et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 1,483 citations
  4. Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer LearningJunxian He, Chunting Zhou, Xuezhe Ma, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick et al.ICLR 2022 · 1,182 citations
  5. DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank AdaptationShih-Yang Liu, Chien-Yi Wang, Hongxu Yin, Pavlo Molchanov et al.ICML 2024 · 820 citations

Related papers

  1. ADePT: Adaptive Decomposed Prompt Tuning for Parameter-Efficient Fine-tuningPengwei Tang, Xiaolin Hu, Yong LiuICLR 2025
  2. Late Prompt Tuning: A Late Prompt Could Be Better Than Many PromptsXiangyang Liu, Tianxiang Sun, Xuanjing Huang, Xipeng QiuEMNLP Findings 2022 · 15 citations
  3. VL-PET: Vision-and-Language Parameter-Efficient Tuning via Granularity ControlZi-Yuan Hu, Yanyang Li, Michael R. Lyu, Liwei WangICCV 2023 · 25 citations
  4. EPT: Efficient Prompt Tuning by Multi-Space Projection and Prompt FusionPengxiang Lan, Enneng Yang, Yuting Liu, Guibing Guo et al.AAAI 2025 · 4 citations
  5. HyperPELT: Unified Parameter-Efficient Language Model Tuning for Both Language and Vision-and-Language TasksZhengkun Zhang, Wenya Guo, Xiaojun Meng, Yasheng Wang et al.ACL Findings 2023 · 12 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines