Outcome-Based Online Reinforcement Learning: Algorithms and Fundamental Limits
Fan Chen, Zeyu Jia, Alexander Rakhlin, Tengyang Xie
Abstract
Reinforcement learning with outcome-based feedback faces a fundamental challenge: when rewards are only observed at trajectory endpoints, how do we assign credit to the right actions? This paper provides the first comprehensive analysis of this problem in online RL with general function approximation. We develop a provably sample-efficient algorithm achieving O(C cov H 3 /ε 2 ) sample complexity, where C cov is the coverability coefficient of the underlying MDP. By leveraging general function approximation, our approach works effectively in large or infinite state spaces where tabular methods fail, requiring only that value functions and reward functions can be represented by appropriate function classes. Our results also characterize when outcome-based feedback is statistically separated from perstep rewards, revealing an unavoidable exponential separation for certain MDPs. For deterministic MDPs, we show how to eliminate the completeness assumption, dramatically simplifying the algorithm. We further extend our approach to preference-based feedback settings, proving that equivalent statistical efficiency can be achieved even under more limited information. Together, these results constitute a theoretical foundation for understanding the statistical properties of outcome-based reinforcement learning.
Policies, value functions, and the Bellman operator. A (randomized) policy π is specified as π h : S → ∆(A), and it induces a distribution P π of trajectory τ = (s 1 , a 1 , • • • , s H , a H ) by s 1 ∼ ρ, and for each h ∈ [H], a h ∼ π h (s h ), s h+1 ∼ T h (s h , a h ). We let E π [•] to be the corresponding expectation.
The expected cumulative reward of a policy π is given by J(π) := E π H h=1 R h (s h , a h ) . The value function and Q-function of π is defined as
Let π ⋆ denote an optimal policy (i.e., π ⋆ ∈ argmax π J(π)), and let V ⋆ and Q ⋆ be the corresponding value function and Q-function. It is well-known that (V ⋆ , Q ⋆ ) satisfies the following Bellman equation for each s ∈ S, a ∈ A, h ∈ [H]:
with the convention that V ⋆ H+1 = 0. Therefore, we define the Bellman operator T h as follows: for any f :
Then, it is straightforward to verify that the Bellman equation reduces to
. Complexity measure of the MDP. Coverability is a natural notion for measuring the difficulty of learning in the underlying MDP (Xie et al., 2022).
Definition 1 (Coverability). For a given MDP M and a policy class Π, the coverability C cov is defined as
where s,a) .
The coverability coefficient of an MDP is an inherent measure of the diversity of the state-action distributions. Our main upper bounds scale with the coverability of the underlying MDP M ⋆ , and in this case we abbreviate C cov (Π) := C cov (Π; M ⋆ ) for succinctness.
Function approximation. In this paper, we work with (model-free) function approximation, where the learner have access to a value function class
The function class F and R consist of candidate functions to approximate Q ⋆ and the ground-truth reward function R ⋆ . 4 In the literature of RL with general function approximation, it is typically assumed that the function classes are realizable, i.e., Q ⋆ ∈ F and R ⋆ ∈ R. In this paper, we adopt the following relaxed realizability condition with a fixed approximation error ε app ≥ 0.
There exists Q ♯ ∈ F and R ♯ ∈ R such that max h∈
For each value function f ∈ F, it induces a greedy policy π f given by π f,h (s) := argmax a∈A f (s, a). Therefore, the value function class F induces a policy class Π F := π f : f ∈ F, and we take our policy class Π = Π F for the remaining part of this paper.
The complexity of the function class is measured by the covering number.
Definition 2 (Covering number). For a function class H ⊆ (X → R) and parameter α ≥ 0, an α-covering of H (with respect to the sup norm) is a subset H ′ ⊆ H such that for any f ∈ H, there exists f ′ ∈ H ′ with sup x∈X |f (x) -f ′ (x)| ≤ α. We define the α-covering number of H as N (H, α) := min|H ′ | : H ′ is a α-covering of H.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a7206ffb-f8bf-4e12-b02e-01d94738db18Cited by top-tier papers3
- Improved Bounds for Private and Robust AlignmentWenqian Weng, Yi He, Xingyu ZhouICML 2026 · 3 citations
- Post-Training with Policy Gradients: Optimality and the Base Model BarrierAlireza Mousavi-Hosseini, Murat ErdogduICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Rethinking the Hardness of PbRL: A Provable General Regret BoundChenjie Mao, Yi Fan, Ning Zhang, Chongjie ZhangICML 2026
Builds on28
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Is Pessimism Provably Efficient for Offline RL?Ying Jin, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran WangICML 2021 · 419 citations
- Bellman-consistent Pessimism for Offline Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Ching-An Cheng, Nan Jiang, Paul Mineiro et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 339 citations
- Bellman Eluder Dimension: New Rich Classes of RL Problems, and Sample-Efficient AlgorithmsChi Jin, Qinghua Liu, Sobhan MiryoosefiNeurIPS 2021 · 264 citations
- Learning Near Optimal Policies with Low Inherent Bellman ErrorAndrea Zanette, Alessandro Lazaric, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Emma BrunskillICML 2020 · 238 citations
Related papers
- A Primal-Dual Algorithm for Offline Constrained Reinforcement Learning with Linear MDPsKihyuk Hong, Ambuj TewariICML 2024 · 5 citations
- Reinforcement Learning with General Value Function Approximation: Provably Efficient Approach via Bounded Eluder DimensionRuosong Wang, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Lin F. YangNeurIPS 2020 · 168 citations
- Provable Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement LearningWenhao Zhan, Masatoshi Uehara, Nathan Kallus, Jason D. Lee et al.ICLR 2024 · 50 citations
- Human-in-the-loop: Provably Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with General Function ApproximationXiaoyu Chen, Han Zhong, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran Wang et al.ICML 2022 · 90 citations
- A General Framework for Sample-Efficient Function Approximation in Reinforcement LearningZixiang Chen, Chris Junchi Li, Huizhuo Yuan, Quanquan Gu et al.ICLR 2023 · 1 citation
