Almost Instance-optimal Clipping for Summation Problems in the Shuffle Model of Differential Privacy
Wei Dong, Qiyao Luo, Giulia Fanti, Elaine Shi, Ke Yi
Abstract
Differentially private mechanisms achieving worst-case optimal error bounds (e.g., the classical Laplace mechanism) are well-studied in the literature. However, when typical data are far from the worst case, instance-specific error bounds-which depend on the largest value in the dataset-are more meaningful. For example, consider the sum estimation problem, where each user has an integer x i from the domain 0, 1, . . . , U and we wish to estimate i x i . This has a worst-case optimal error of O(U/ε), while recent work has shown that the clipping mechanism can achieve an instance-optimal error of O(max i x i •log log U/ε). Under the shuffle model, known instance-optimal protocols are less communication-efficient. The clipping mechanism also works in the shuffle model, but requires two rounds: Round one finds the clipping threshold, and round two does the clipping and computes the noisy sum of the clipped data. In this paper, we show how these two seemingly sequential steps can be done simultaneously in one round using just 1 + o(1) messages per user, while maintaining the instance-optimal error bound. We also extend our technique to the high-dimensional sum estimation problem and sparse vector aggregation (a.k.a. frequency estimation under user-level differential privacy).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a64ca3af-5c26-45ce-9aad-66c8fa4e69f4Cited by top-tier papers5
- Robust Estimation of Sparse Numerical Vectors under Local Differential PrivacyPuning Zhao, Zhikun Zhang, Shaowei Wang, Sheng Yue et al.CCS 2026
- Unlocking the Power of Differentially Private Zeroth-order Optimization for Fine-tuning LLMsErgute Bao, Yangfan Jiang, Fei Wei, Xiaokui Xiao et al.USENIX Security 2025
- A General Framework for Per-record Differential PrivacyXinghe Chen, Dajun Sun, Quanqing Xu, Wei DongSIGMOD 2026
- How Researchers De-Identify Data in PracticeWentao Guo, Paige Pepitone, Adam J. Aviv, Michelle L. MazurekUSENIX Security 2025
- Robust Single-Message Shuffle Differential Privacy Protocol for Accurate Distribution EstimationXiaoguang Li, Hanyi Wang, Yaowei Huang, Jungang Yang et al.ICDE 2026
Builds on17
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Practical Secure Aggregation for Privacy-Preserving Machine LearningKallista A. Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone et al.CCS 2017 · 3,936 citations
- Differentially Private Learning with Adaptive ClippingGalen Andrew, Om Thakkar, Brendan McMahan, Swaroop RamaswamyNeurIPS 2021 · 425 citations
- CoinPress: Practical Private Mean and Covariance EstimationSourav Biswas, Yihe Dong, Gautam Kamath, Jonathan R. UllmanNeurIPS 2020 · 134 citations
- Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential PrivacyZiyue Huang, Yuting Liang, Ke YiNeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
Related papers
- Differentially Private Aggregation in the Shuffle Model: Almost Central Accuracy in Almost a Single MessageBadih Ghazi, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Rasmus Pagh et al.ICML 2021 · 45 citations
- Frequency Estimation in the Shuffle Model with Almost a Single MessageQiyao Luo, Yilei Wang, Ke YiCCS 2022 · 6 citations
- Shuffling-Aware Optimization for Private Vector Mean EstimationShun Takagi, Seng Pei LiewICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Unbounded Differentially Private Quantile and Maximum EstimationDavid DurfeeNeurIPS 2023 · 14 citations
- Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle ModelBorja Balle, James Bell, Adrià Gascón, Kobbi NissimCCS 2020 · 52 citations
