One Explanation is Not Enough: Structured Attention Graphs for Image Classification
Vivswan Shitole, Fuxin Li, Minsuk Kahng, Prasad Tadepalli, Alan Fern
Abstract
Saliency maps are popular tools for explaining the decisions of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image classification. Typically, for each image of interest, a single saliency map is produced, which assigns weights to pixels based on their importance to the classification. We argue that a single saliency map provides an incomplete understanding since there are often many other maps that can explain a classification equally well. In this paper, we propose to utilize a beam search algorithm to systematically search for multiple explanations for each image. Results show that there are indeed multiple relatively localized explanations for many images. However, naively showing multiple explanations to users can be overwhelming and does not reveal their common and distinct structures. We introduce structured attention graphs (SAGs), which compactly represent sets of attention maps for an image by visualizing how different combinations of image regions impact the confidence of a classifier. An approach to computing a compact and representative SAG for visualization is proposed via diverse sampling. We conduct a user study comparing the use of SAGs to traditional saliency maps for answering comparative counterfactual questions about image classifications. Our results show that user accuracy is increased significantly when presented with SAGs compared to standard saliency map baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a4facd49-69a1-4fb0-b029-ff933c557186Cited by top-tier papers8
- "Help Me Help the AI": Understanding How Explainability Can Support Human-AI InteractionSunnie S. Y. Kim, Elizabeth Anne Watkins, Olga Russakovsky, Ruth Fong et al.CHI 2023 · 178 citations
- Learning Support and Trivial Prototypes for Interpretable Image ClassificationChong Wang, Yuyuan Liu, Yuanhong Chen, Fengbei Liu et al.ICCV 2023 · 50 citations
- I Am Big, You Are Little; I Am Right, You Are WrongDavid A. Kelly, Akchunya Chanchal, Nathan BlakeICCV 2025 · 9 citations
- Enhance Sketch Recognition's Explainability via Semantic Component-Level ParsingGuangming Zhu, Siyuan Wang, Tianci Wu, Liang ZhangAAAI 2024 · 2 citations
- Comparing the Decision-Making Mechanisms by Transformers and CNNs via Explanation MethodsMingqi Jiang, Saeed Khorram, Fuxin LiCVPR 2024
Builds on1
Related papers
- ACAT: Adversarial Counterfactual Attention for Classification and Detection in Medical ImagingAlessandro Fontanella, Antreas Antoniou, Wenwen Li, Joanna M. Wardlaw et al.ICML 2023 · 15 citations
- Counterfactual-based Saliency Map: Towards Visual Contrastive Explanations for Neural NetworksXue Wang, Zhibo Wang, Haiqin Weng, Hengchang Guo et al.ICCV 2023 · 15 citations
- Do Users Benefit From Interpretable Vision? A User Study, Baseline, And DatasetLeon Sixt, Martin Schuessler, Oana-Iuliana Popescu, Philipp Weiß et al.ICLR 2022 · 21 citations
- SCOUT: Self-Aware Discriminant Counterfactual ExplanationsPei Wang, Nuno VasconcelosCVPR 2020
- Interpretable Graph Capsule Networks for Object RecognitionJindong GuAAAI 2021 · 42 citations
