Counterfactual-based Saliency Map: Towards Visual Contrastive Explanations for Neural Networks

Explaining deep models in a human-understandable way has been explored by many works that mostly explain why an input causes a corresponding prediction (i.e., Why P?). However, seldom they could handle those more complex causal questions like "Why P rather than Q?" and "Why one is P, while another is Q?", which would better help humans understand the behavior of deep models. Considering the insufficient study on such complex causal questions, we make the first attempt to explain different causal questions by contrastive explanations in a unified framework, i.e., Counterfactual Contrastive Explanation (CCE), which visually and intuitively explains the aforementioned questions via a novel positive-negative saliency-based explanation scheme. More specifically, we propose a content-aware counterfactual perturbing algorithm to stimulate contrastive examples, from which a pair of positive and negative saliency maps could be derived to contrastively explain why P (positive class) rather than Q (negative class). Beyond existing works, our counterfactual perturbation meets the principles of validity, sparsity, and data distribution closeness at the same time. In addition, by slightly adjusting the objective of perturbation, our framework can adapt to different causal questions. Extensive experimental evaluation demonstrates the effectiveness and superior performance of the proposed CCE on different benchmark metrics for interpretability, including Sanity Check, Class Deviation Score and Insertion-Deletion tests. A user study is conducted and the results show that user confidence is increasing significantly when presented with CCE compared to standard saliency map baselines.