IDLD: Instantaneous Detection of Leakage and Duplication of Identifiers used for Register Renaming
Yiannakis Sazeides, Alex Gerber, Ron Gabor, Arkady Bramnik, George Papadimitriou, Dimitris Gizopoulos, Chrysostomos Nicopoulos, Giorgos Dimitrakopoulos, Karyofyllis Patsidis
Abstract
In this paper, we propose a cost-effective microarchitectural technique capable of Instantaneously Detecting the Leakage and Duplication (IDLD) of the physical register identifiers used for register renaming in modern out-of-order processor cores. Leakage occurs when a physical register identifier disappears, whereas duplication occurs when the physical register identifier appears twice throughout the renaming logic. IDLD checks each cycle that a code calculated by xoring the physical register identifiers read from and written to arrays, used for managing physical registers allocation, renaming and reclamation, is zero. This invariance is intrinsic to the register renaming subsystem functionality and allows detecting an identifier leakage and duplication instantaneously. Detection of bugs in the complex register renaming subsystem is challenging, since: (a) its operation is not directly observable in program or architectural visible locations, (b) it lies in time-critical paths in the heart of every modern out-of-order core, and (c) it is often the target for optimizations in new core designs, and thus, more susceptible to bugs than legacy subsystems. We demonstrate that bugs in the renaming logic can be very difficult to root cause because, for numerous cases, it takes excessive time, e.g., millions of cycles, for a duplication or leakage to become an architecturally observable error. Even worse, activations of such bugs, depending on microarchitectural state, are often masked by subsequent hardware operations. Hence, an activation of a rarely occurring leakage or duplication bug during post-silicon validation can go undetected and escape in the field. The difficulty of root-causing register identifier duplication and leakage without IDLD is demonstrated using detailed bug modeling at the microarchitecture level, whereas the low overhead of IDLD is confirmed using RTL design analysis.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- ATR: Out-of-Order Register Release Exploiting Atomic RegionsYinyuan Zhao, Surim Oh, Mingsheng Xu, Heiner LitzMICRO 2025 · 2 citations
- Speculative Register ReclamationSanyam MehtaHPCA 2023 · 3 citations
- Automatic Microprocessor Performance Bug DetectionErick Carvajal Barboza, Sara Jacob, Mahesh Ketkar, Michael Kishinevsky et al.HPCA 2021 · 11 citations
- CASINO Core Microarchitecture: Generating Out-of-Order Schedules Using Cascaded In-Order Scheduling WindowsIpoom Jeong, Seihoon Park, Changmin Lee, Won Woo RoHPCA 2020 · 13 citations
- Towards Micro-architectural Leakage Simulators: Reverse Engineering Micro-architectural Leakage Features Is PracticalSi Gao, Elisabeth Oswald, Dan PageEUROCRYPT 2022 · 8 citations
