PIED: Physics-Informed Experimental Design for Inverse Problems
Apivich Hemachandra, Gregory Kang Ruey Lau, See-Kiong Ng, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low
Abstract
In many inverse problems (IPs) in science and engineering, optimization of design parameters (e.g., sensor placement) with experimental design (ED) methods is performed due to high data acquisition costs when conducting physical experiments, and often has to be done up front due to practical constraints on sensor deployments. However, existing ED methods are often challenging to use in practical PDE-based inverse problems due to significant computational bottlenecks during forward simulation and inverse parameter estimation. This paper presents Physics-Informed Experimental Design (PIED), the first ED framework that makes use of PINNs in a fully differentiable architecture to perform continuous optimization of design parameters for IPs. PIED utilizes techniques such as learning of a shared NN parameter initialization, and approximation of PINN training dynamics during the ED process, for better estimation of the inverse parameters. PIED selects the optimal design parameters for one-shot deployment, allows exploitation of parallel computation unlike existing methods, and is empirically shown to significantly outperform existing ED benchmarks in IPs for both finite-dimensional and functionvalued inverse parameters given limited budget for observations.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a2bd7f3d-1711-4bb5-b76c-89d75a94b0afBuilds on5
- BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian OptimizationMaximilian Balandat, Brian Karrer, Daniel R. Jiang, Samuel Daulton et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 686 citations
- Efficient and Modular Implicit DifferentiationMathieu Blondel, Quentin Berthet, Marco Cuturi, Roy Frostig et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 386 citations
- Deep Adaptive Design: Amortizing Sequential Bayesian Experimental DesignAdam Foster, Desi R. Ivanova, Ilyas Malik, Tom RainforthICML 2021 · 119 citations
- Implicit Deep Adaptive Design: Policy-Based Experimental Design without LikelihoodsDesi R. Ivanova, Adam Foster, Steven Kleinegesse, Michael U. Gutmann et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 81 citations
- PINNACLE: PINN Adaptive ColLocation and Experimental points selectionGregory Kang Ruey Lau, Apivich Hemachandra, See-Kiong Ng, Bryan Kian Hsiang LowICLR 2024 · 43 citations
Related papers
- PIXEL: Physics-Informed Cell Representations for Fast and Accurate PDE SolversNamgyu Kang, Byeonghyeon Lee, Youngjoon Hong, Seok-Bae Yun et al.AAAI 2023 · 27 citations
- Parameterized Physics-informed Neural Networks for Parameterized PDEsWoojin Cho, Minju Jo, Haksoo Lim, Kookjin Lee et al.ICML 2024 · 57 citations
- TINNs: Time-Induced Neural Networks for Solving Time-Dependent PDEsChen-Yang Dai, Che-Chia Chang, Te-Sheng Lin, Ming-Chih Lai et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Symbolic Differential Operator Discovery with Sparse DataLena Podina, Brydon Eastman, Mohammad KohandelICML 2023 · 25 citations
- Separable Physics-Informed Neural NetworksJunwoo Cho, Seungtae Nam, Hyunmo Yang, Seok-Bae Yun et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 138 citations
