USENIX Security2017Top-tier venue
CLKSCREW: Exposing the Perils of Security-Oblivious Energy Management
Adrian Tang, Simha Sethumadhavan, Salvatore J. Stolfo
Abstract
The need for power-and energy-efficient computing has resulted in aggressive cooperative hardware-software energy management mechanisms on modern commodity devices. Most systems today, for example, allow software to control the frequency and voltage of the underlying hardware at a very fine granularity to extend battery life. Despite their benefits, these software-exposed energy management mechanisms pose grave security implications that have not been studied before.
In this work, we present the CLKSCREW attack, a new class of fault attacks that exploit the securityobliviousness of energy management mechanisms to break security. A novel benefit for the attackers is that these fault attacks become more accessible since they can now be conducted without the need for physical access to the devices or fault injection equipment. We demonstrate CLKSCREW on commodity ARM/Android devices. We show that a malicious kernel driver (1) can extract secret cryptographic keys from Trustzone, and (2) can escalate its privileges by loading self-signed code into Trustzone. As the first work to show the security ramifications of energy management mechanisms, we urge the community to re-examine these security-oblivious designs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a2783d33-01ae-4fcc-a81f-b7d4417f7742Cited by top-tier papers39
- Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative ExecutionPaul Kocher, Jann Horn, Anders Fogh, Daniel Genkin et al.S&P 2019 · 2,435 citations
- Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGXKit Murdock, David F. Oswald, Flavio D. Garcia, Jo Van Bulck et al.S&P 2020 · 369 citations
- LVI: Hijacking Transient Execution through Microarchitectural Load Value InjectionJo Van Bulck, Daniel Moghimi, Michael Schwarz, Moritz Lipp et al.S&P 2020 · 275 citations
- Terminal Brain Damage: Exposing the Graceless Degradation in Deep Neural Networks Under Hardware Fault AttacksSanghyun Hong, Pietro Frigo, Yigitcan Kaya, Cristiano Giuffrida et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 255 citations
- SoK: Understanding the Prevailing Security Vulnerabilities in TrustZone-assisted TEE SystemsDavid Cerdeira, Nuno Santos, Pedro Fonseca, Sandro PintoS&P 2020 · 231 citations
Builds on3
- Drammer: Deterministic Rowhammer Attacks on Mobile PlatformsVictor van der Veen, Yanick Fratantonio, Martina Lindorfer, Daniel Gruss et al.CCS 2016 · 381 citations
- Flip Feng Shui: Hammering a Needle in the Software StackKaveh Razavi, Ben Gras, Erik Bosman, Bart Preneel et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 306 citations
- Return-Oriented Flush-Reload Side Channels on ARM and Their Implications for Android DevicesXiaokuan Zhang, Yuan Xiao, Yinqian ZhangCCS 2016 · 77 citations
Related papers
- VoltJockey: Breaching TrustZone by Software-Controlled Voltage Manipulation over Multi-core FrequenciesPengfei Qiu, Dongsheng Wang, Yongqiang Lyu, Gang QuCCS 2019 · 124 citations
- Return-to-Non-Secure Vulnerabilities on ARM Cortex-M TrustZone: Attack and DefenseZheyuan Ma, Xi Tan, Lukasz Ziarek, Ning Zhang et al.DAC 2023 · 8 citations
- Hardware-Backed Heist: Extracting ECDSA Keys from Qualcomm's TrustZoneKeegan RyanCCS 2019 · 90 citations
- Trust Dies in Darkness: Shedding Light on Samsung's TrustZone Keymaster DesignAlon Shakevsky, Eyal Ronen, Avishai WoolUSENIX Security 2022
- A Novel GPU Overdrive Fault AttackMajid Sabbagh, Yunsi Fei, David R. KaeliDAC 2020 · 22 citations
