Safety and Community Context: Exploring a Transfeminist Approach to Sapphic Relationship Platforms
Michael Ann DeVito, Jessica L. Feuston, Erika Melder, Christen Malloy, Cade Ponder, Jed R. Brubaker
Abstract
Relationship platforms (e.g., dating apps) are crucial tools for sapphics (trans women, cisgender women, and nonbinary people who are attracted to other sapphics). However, current platforms are not designed in a way that accounts for sapphic lived experience, especially the lived experience of sapphics who hold multiple marginalized identity characteristics. Even on platforms that do exist for sapphics, transgender women and nonbinary people are often subject to discrimination, fetishization, and stigmatization. To aid in the design of platforms that better serve the needs of multiply marginalized sapphics, we engaged a diverse group of 25 sapphics in six rounds of community discussion on key topics for relationship platform design. Based on participant discussions, we identify key challenges when designing for multiply marginalized sapphics around relationship structures, gender and sexuality classification, and safety priorities for interaction. We present two design priorities alongside community-sourced design directions which can help future designers address these challenges: identity-centric safety and community-based information formats.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a25a06c6-5df8-4a9b-b58e-99717f973072Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on7
- What Do We Mean by "Accessibility Research"?: A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to 2019Kelly Mack, Emma McDonnell, Dhruv Jain, Lucy Lu Wang et al.CHI 2021 · 323 citations
- Adaptive Folk Theorization as a Path to Algorithmic Literacy on Changing PlatformsMichael Ann DeVitoCSCW 2021 · 143 citations
- Designing Trans Technology: Defining Challenges and Envisioning Community-Centered SolutionsOliver L. Haimson, Dykee Gorrell, Denny L. Starks, Zu WeingerCHI 2020 · 138 citations
- "'More gay' fits in better": Intracommunity Power Dynamics and Harms in Online LGBTQ+ SpacesAshley Marie Walker, Michael A. DeVitoCHI 2020 · 80 citations
- Values (Mis)alignment: Exploring Tensions Between Platform and LGBTQ+ Community Design ValuesMichael Ann DeVito, Ashley Marie Walker, Julia R. FernandezCSCW 2021 · 59 citations
Related papers
- XOXO or XX/XY? Gender Essentialism and Queer Exclusion on Dating AppsKaty Weathington, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jed R. BrubakerCSCW 2025 · 3 citations
- The Pit Beneath the Town Square: How Digital Solastalgia Affects Platform Migration and Community Structures of Transfeminine UsersErika Melder, Veronica E. Rubinsztain, Jiaqi Li, Emma Vonbuelow et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- "How would I know what I would want from or with them?': Supporting A-Spec Approaches to Developing Relationships Through Online PlatformsKelly Wang, Ashlee Milton, Leah Namisa Rosenbloom, Erika Melder et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Social Media as Marginalisation Machine: The Trans Desire for Solidarity SpacesKay Kender, Katta SpielCHI 2025 · 12 citations
- "So Close, yet So Far": Exploring Sexual-minority Women's Relationship-building via Online Dating in ChinaYichao Cui, Naomi Yamashita, Mingjie Liu, Yi-Chieh LeeCHI 2022 · 25 citations
