Adaptive Folk Theorization as a Path to Algorithmic Literacy on Changing Platforms
Michael Ann DeVito
Abstract
Te increased importance of opaque, algorithmically-driven social platforms (e.g., Facebook, YouTube) to everyday users as a medium for self-presentation effectively requires users to speculate on how platforms work in order to decide how to behave to achieve their self-presentation goals. Tis speculation takes the form of folk theorization. Because platforms constantly change, users must constantly re-evaluate their folk theories. Based on an Asynchronous Remote Community study of LGBTQ+ social platform users with heightened self-presentation concerns, I present an updated model of the folk theorization process to account for platform change. Moreover, I find that both the complexity of the user's folk theorization and their overall relationship with the platform impact this theorization process, and present new concepts for examining and classifying these elements: theorization complexity level and perceived platform spirit. I conclude by proposing a folk theorization-based path towards an extensible algorithmic literacy that would support users in ongoing theorization.
CCS Concepts: •Human-centered computing Collaborative and social computing Empirical studies in collaborative and social computing •Human-centered computing Human computer interaction (HCI) Empirical studies in HCI •Social and professional topics User characteristics
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 561fce89-6346-485f-8f2d-8bedbded5eb2Cited by top-tier papers21
- The Algorithmic Crystal: Conceptualizing the Self through Algorithmic Personalization on TikTokAngela Y. Lee, Hannah Mieczkowski, Nicole B. Ellison, Jeffrey T. HancockCSCW 2022 · 127 citations
- Toward User-Driven Algorithm Auditing: Investigating users' strategies for uncovering harmful algorithmic behaviorAlicia DeVos, Aditi Dhabalia, Hong Shen, Kenneth Holstein et al.CHI 2022 · 96 citations
- "I Got Flagged for Supposed Bullying, Even Though It Was in Response to Someone Harassing Me About My Disability.": A Study of Blind TikTokers' Content Moderation ExperiencesYao Lyu, Jie Cai, Anisa Callis, Kelley Cotter et al.CHI 2024 · 25 citations
- Explorable Explainable AI: Improving AI Understanding for Community Health Workers in IndiaIan René Solano-Kamaiko, Dibyendu Mishra, Nicola Dell, Aditya VashisthaCHI 2024 · 21 citations
- Hashtag Re-Appropriation for Audience Control on Recommendation-Driven Social Media Xiaohongshu (rednote)Ruyuan Wan, Lingbo Tong, Tiffany Knearem, Toby Jia-Jun Li et al.CHI 2025 · 19 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- How Transfeminine TikTok Creators Navigate the Algorithmic Trap of Visibility Via Folk TheorizationMichael Ann DeVitoCSCW 2022 · 125 citations
- "What are you doing, TikTok?" : How Marginalized Social Media Users Perceive, Theorize, and "Prove" ShadowbanningDaniel Delmonaco, Samuel Mayworm, Hibby Thach, Josh Guberman et al.CSCW 2024 · 46 citations
- Algorithmic Folk Theories and Identity: How TikTok Users Co-Produce Knowledge of Identity and Engage in Algorithmic ResistanceNadia Karizat, Daniel Delmonaco, Motahhare Eslami, Nazanin AndalibiCSCW 2021 · 338 citations
- For You, or For"You"?: Everyday LGBTQ+ Encounters with TikTokEllen Simpson, Bryan C. SemaanCSCW 2020 · 228 citations
- "They've Over-Emphasized That One Search": Controlling Unwanted Content on TikTok's For You PageJulie A. Vera, Sourojit GhoshCHI 2025 · 3 citations
