Fairness-Aware Multi-view Evidential Learning with Adaptive Prior
Haishun Chen, Cai Xu, Jinlong Yu, Yilin Zhang, Ziyu Guan, Wei Zhao, Fangyuan Zhao, Xin Yang
Abstract
Multi-view evidential learning aims to integrate information from multiple views to improve prediction performance and provide trustworthy uncertainty estimation. Most previous methods assume that view-specific evidence learning is naturally reliable. However, in practice, the evidence learning process tends to be biased. Through empirical analysis on real-world data, we reveal that samples tend to be assigned more evidence to support data-rich classes, thereby leading to unreliable uncertainty estimation in predictions. This motivates us to delve into a new Biased Evidential Multi-view Learning (BEML) problem. To this end, we propose Fairness-Aware Multi-view Evidential Learning (FAML). FAML first introduces an adaptive prior based on training trajectories, which acts as a regularization strategy to flexibly calibrate the biased evidence learning process. Furthermore, we explicitly incorporate a fairness constraint based on class-wise evidence variance to promote balanced evidence allocation. In the multi-view fusion stage, we propose an opinion alignment mechanism to mitigate viewspecific bias across views, thereby encouraging the integration of consistent and mutually supportive evidence. Theoretical analysis shows that FAML enhances fairness in the evidence learning process. Extensive experiments on six realworld multi-view datasets demonstrate that FAML achieves more balanced evidence allocation and improves both prediction performance and the reliability of uncertainty estimation compared to state-of-the-art methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a24f6c92-7cd7-4d54-b984-d574271af94eCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on10
- Uncertainty Estimation by Fisher Information-based Evidential Deep LearningDanruo Deng, Guangyong Chen, Yang Yu, Furui Liu et al.ICML 2023 · 82 citations
- Trustworthy Long-Tailed ClassificationBolian Li, Zongbo Han, Haining Li, Huazhu Fu et al.CVPR 2022 · 82 citations
- Post-hoc Uncertainty Learning Using a Dirichlet Meta-ModelMaohao Shen, Yuheng Bu, Prasanna Sattigeri, Soumya Ghosh et al.AAAI 2023 · 51 citations
- Learn to Accumulate Evidence from All Training Samples: Theory and PracticeDeep Shankar Pandey, Qi YuICML 2023 · 31 citations
- R-EDL: Relaxing Nonessential Settings of Evidential Deep LearningMengyuan Chen, Junyu Gao, Changsheng XuICLR 2024 · 18 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Equal Views: Strength-Adaptive Evidential Multi-View LearningCai Xu, Ziqi Wen, Jie Zhao, Wanqing Zhao et al.ACM MM 2025 · 2 citations
- Trusted Multi-View Deep Learning with Opinion AggregationWei Liu, Xiaodong Yue, Yufei Chen, Thierry DenoeuxAAAI 2022 · 81 citations
- Reliable Conflictive Multi-View LearningCai Xu, Jiajun Si, Ziyu Guan, Wei Zhao et al.AAAI 2024 · 121 citations
- Dynamic Evidence Decoupling for Trusted Multi-view LearningYing Liu, Lihong Liu, Cai Xu, Xiangyu Song et al.ACM MM 2024 · 11 citations
- Deep Fuzzy Multi-view Learning for Reliable ClassificationSiyuan Duan, Yuan Sun, Dezhong Peng, Guiduo Duan et al.ICML 2025
