Learn to Accumulate Evidence from All Training Samples: Theory and Practice
Deep Shankar Pandey, Qi Yu
Abstract
Evidential deep learning, built upon belief theory and subjective logic, offers a principled and computationally efficient way to turn a deterministic neural network uncertainty-aware. The resultant evidential models can quantify fine-grained uncertainty using the learned evidence. To ensure theoretically sound evidential models, the evidence needs to be non-negative, which requires special activation functions for model training and inference. This constraint often leads to inferior predictive performance compared to standard softmax models, making it challenging to extend them to many large-scale datasets. To unveil the real cause of this undesired behavior, we theoretically investigate evidential models and identify a fundamental limitation that explains the inferior performance: existing evidential activation functions create zero evidence regions, which prevent the model to learn from training samples falling into such regions. A deeper analysis of evidential activation functions based on our theoretical underpinning inspires the design of a novel regularizer that effectively alleviates this fundamental limitation. Extensive experiments over many challenging real-world datasets and settings confirm our theoretical findings and demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers16
- Hyper-opinion Evidential Deep Learning for Out-of-Distribution DetectionJingen Qu, Yufei Chen, Xiaodong Yue, Wei Fu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations
- Uncertainty Regularized Evidential RegressionKai Ye, Tiejin Chen, Hua Wei, Liang ZhanAAAI 2024 · 15 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation by Flexible Evidential Deep LearningTaeseong Yoon, Heeyoung KimNeurIPS 2025 · 12 citations
- Evidential Copula Concept Embedding ModelsYanjie Qiu, Xiaodong Yue, Xuhui Fan, Yufei Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- Weakly-Supervised Residual Evidential Learning for Multi-Instance Uncertainty EstimationPei Liu, Luping JiICML 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on9
- Deep Evidential RegressionAlexander Amini, Wilko Schwarting, Ava Soleimany, Daniela RusNeurIPS 2020 · 777 citations
- Posterior Network: Uncertainty Estimation without OOD Samples via Density-Based Pseudo-CountsBertrand Charpentier, Daniel Zügner, Stephan GünnemannNeurIPS 2020 · 263 citations
- Evidential Deep Learning for Open Set Action RecognitionWentao Bao, Qi Yu, Yu KongICCV 2021 · 204 citations
- Uncertainty Aware Semi-Supervised Learning on Graph DataXujiang Zhao, Feng Chen, Shu Hu, Jin-Hee ChoNeurIPS 2020 · 178 citations
- Evaluating Robustness of Predictive Uncertainty Estimation: Are Dirichlet-based Models Reliable?Anna-Kathrin Kopetzki, Bertrand Charpentier, Daniel Zügner, Sandhya Giri et al.ICML 2021 · 55 citations
Related papers
- Are Uncertainty Quantification Capabilities of Evidential Deep Learning a Mirage?Maohao Shen, Jongha Jon Ryu, Soumya Ghosh, Yuheng Bu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 29 citations
- Is Epistemic Uncertainty Faithfully Represented by Evidential Deep Learning Methods?Mira Jürgens, Nis Meinert, Viktor Bengs, Eyke Hüllermeier et al.ICML 2024 · 35 citations
- The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Evidential RegressionNis Meinert, Jakob Gawlikowski, Alexander LavinAAAI 2023 · 58 citations
- R-EDL: Relaxing Nonessential Settings of Evidential Deep LearningMengyuan Chen, Junyu Gao, Changsheng XuICLR 2024 · 18 citations
- Evidential Turing ProcessesMelih Kandemir, Abdullah Akgül, Manuel Haußmann, Gozde UnalICLR 2022 · 10 citations
