InstructDiff: Domain-Adaptive Data Selection via Contrastive Entropy for Efficient LLM Fine-Tuning
Junyou Su, He Zhu, Xiao Luo, Liyu Zhang, Hong-Yu Zhou, Yun Chen, Peng Li, Yang Liu, Guanhua Chen
Abstract
Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is fundamental to adapting large language models, yet training on complete datasets incurs prohibitive costs with diminishing returns. Existing data selection methods suffer from severe domain specificity: techniques optimized for general instruction-following fail on reasoning tasks, and vice versa. We observe that measuring contrastive entropy between base models and minimally instruction-tuned calibrated models reveals a pattern-samples with the lowest contrastive entropy consistently yield optimal performance across domains, yet this principle manifests domain-adaptively: reasoning tasks favor entropy increase (cognitive expansion), while general tasks favor entropy decrease (cognitive compression). We introduce InstructDiff, a unified framework that operationalizes contrastive entropy as a domain-adaptive selection criterion through warmup calibration, bi-directional NLL filtering, and entropy-based ranking. Extensive experiments show that IN S T R U C TDI F F achieves 17% relative improvement over full data training on mathematical reasoning and 52% for general instruction-following, outperforming prior baselines while using only 10% of the data.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on14
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
- LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora et al.ICML 2024 · 460 citations
- What Makes Good Data for Alignment? A Comprehensive Study of Automatic Data Selection in Instruction TuningWei Liu, Weihao Zeng, Keqing He, Yong Jiang et al.ICLR 2024 · 369 citations
Related papers
- Light-IF: Endowing LLMs with Generalizable Reasoning via Preview and Self-Checking for Complex Instruction FollowingChenyang Wang, Liang Wen, Shousheng Jia, Xiangzheng Zhang et al.AAAI 2026 · 5 citations
- SRFT: A Single-Stage Method with Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for ReasoningYuqian Fu, Tinghong Chen, Jiajun Chai, Xihuai Wang et al.ICLR 2026 · 97 citations
- DiffAdapt: Difficulty-Adaptive Reasoning for Token-Efficient LLM InferenceXiang Liu, Xuming Hu, Xiaowen Chu, Eunsol ChoiICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- EDCO: Dynamic Curriculum Orchestration for Domain-specific Large Language Model Fine-tuningJing-Cheng Pang, Sun Liu, Chang Zhou, Xian Tang et al.ICML 2026
- Learning Diverse Responses with Prefix-Conditioned Supervised Fine-TuningZhiyuan Fan, Guanqiao Chen, Yanyi Huang, Mingkuan Zhao et al.ACL 2026
