Reference Matters: Benchmarking Factual Error Correction for Dialogue Summarization with Fine-grained Evaluation Framework
Mingqi Gao, Xiaojun Wan, Jia Su, Zhefeng Wang, Baoxing Huai
Abstract
Factuality is important to dialogue summarization. Factual error correction (FEC) of modelgenerated summaries is one way to improve factuality. Current FEC evaluation that relies on factuality metrics is not reliable and detailed enough. To address this problem, we are the first to manually annotate a FEC dataset for dialogue summarization containing 4000 items and propose FERRANTI, a fine-grained evaluation framework based on reference correction that automatically evaluates the performance of FEC models on different error categories. Using this evaluation framework, we conduct sufficient experiments with FEC approaches under a variety of settings and find the best training modes and significant differences in the performance of the existing approaches on different factual error categories. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a09b891b-a06a-428c-a126-cd8e1329922aCited by top-tier papers3
- Do Automatic Factuality Metrics Measure Factuality? A Critical EvaluationSanjana Ramprasad, Byron C. WallaceNeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Instructive Dialogue Summarization with Query AggregationsBin Wang, Zhengyuan Liu, Nancy F. ChenEMNLP 2023 · 5 citations
- Analyzing LLM Behavior in Dialogue Summarization: Unveiling Circumstantial Hallucination TrendsSanjana Ramprasad, Elisa Ferracane, Zachary C. LiptonACL 2024
Builds on14
- PEGASUS: Pre-training with Extracted Gap-sentences for Abstractive SummarizationJingqing Zhang, Yao Zhao, Mohammad Saleh, Peter J. LiuICML 2020 · 2,453 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- Multi-View Sequence-to-Sequence Models with Conversational Structure for Abstractive Dialogue SummarizationJiaao Chen, Diyi YangEMNLP 2020 · 121 citations
- Multi-Fact Correction in Abstractive Text SummarizationYue Dong, Shuohang Wang, Zhe Gan, Yu Cheng et al.EMNLP 2020 · 99 citations
- FEQA: A Question Answering Evaluation Framework for Faithfulness Assessment in Abstractive SummarizationEsin Durmus, He He, Mona T. DiabACL 2020 · 90 citations
Related papers
- Analyzing and Evaluating Faithfulness in Dialogue SummarizationBin Wang, Chen Zhang, Yan Zhang, Yiming Chen et al.EMNLP 2022 · 15 citations
- Annotating and Detecting Fine-grained Factual Errors for Dialogue SummarizationRongxin Zhu, Jianzhong Qi, Jey Han LauACL 2023 · 1 citation
- Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error DetectorsLiyan Tang, Tanya Goyal, Alexander R. Fabbri, Philippe Laban et al.ACL 2023 · 38 citations
- X-FACTOR: A Cross-metric Evaluation of Factual Correctness in Abstractive SummarizationSubhajit Chaudhury, Sarathkrishna Swaminathan, R. Chulaka Gunasekara, Maxwell Crouse et al.EMNLP 2022 · 13 citations
- Questioning the Validity of Summarization Datasets and Improving Their Factual ConsistencyYanzhu Guo, Chloé Clavel, Moussa Kamal Eddine, Michalis VazirgiannisEMNLP 2022 · 5 citations
