On the Hölder Stability of Multiset and Graph Neural Networks
Yair Davidson, Nadav Dym
Abstract
Extensive research efforts have been put into characterizing and constructing maximally separating multiset and graph neural networks. However, recent empirical evidence suggests the notion of separation itself doesn't capture several interesting phenomena. On the one hand, the quality of this separation may be very weak, to the extent that the embeddings of "separable" objects might even be considered identical when using fixed finite precision. On the other hand, architectures which aren't capable of separation in theory, somehow achieve separation when taking the network to be wide enough. In this work, we address both of these issues, by proposing a novel pair-wise separation quality analysis framework which is based on an adaptation of Lipschitz and stability to parametric functions. The proposed framework, which we name * in expectation*, allows for separation quality analysis, without restricting the analysis to embeddings that can separate all the input space simultaneously. We prove that common sum-based models are lower- in expectation, with an exponent that decays rapidly with the network's depth . Our analysis leads to adversarial examples of graphs which can be separated by three 1-WL iterations, but cannot be separated in practice by standard maximally powerful Message Passing Neural Networks (MPNNs). To remedy this, we propose two novel MPNNs with improved separation quality, one of which is lower Lipschitz in expectation. We show these MPNNs can easily classify our adversarial examples, and compare favorably with standard MPNNs on standard graph learning tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Graph Representational Learning: When Does More Expressivity Hurt Generalization?Sohir Maskey, Raffaele Paolino, Fabian Jogl, Gitta Kutyniok et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- On Universality Classes of Equivariant NetworksMarco Pacini, Gabriele Santin, Bruno Lepri, Shubhendu TrivediNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Monotone and Separable Set Functions: Characterizations and Neural ModelsSoutrik Sarangi, Yonatan Sverdlov, Nadav Dym, Abir DeNeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on9
- Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural NetworksWeihua Hu, Bowen Liu, Joseph Gomes, Marinka Zitnik et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,744 citations
- Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional RepresentationsVijay Prakash Dwivedi, Anh Tuan Luu, Thomas Laurent, Yoshua Bengio et al.ICLR 2022 · 464 citations
- Equivariant Subgraph Aggregation NetworksBeatrice Bevilacqua, Fabrizio Frasca, Derek Lim, Balasubramaniam Srinivasan et al.ICLR 2022 · 217 citations
- Tree Mover's Distance: Bridging Graph Metrics and Stability of Graph Neural NetworksChing-Yao Chuang, Stefanie JegelkaNeurIPS 2022 · 53 citations
- Neural Injective Functions for Multisets, Measures and Graphs via a Finite Witness TheoremTal Amir, Steven J. Gortler, Ilai Avni, Ravina Ravina et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 44 citations
Related papers
- Expressiveness and Approximation Properties of Graph Neural NetworksFloris Geerts, Juan L. ReutterICLR 2022 · 78 citations
- A graphon-signal analysis of graph neural networksRon LevieNeurIPS 2023 · 36 citations
- Let's Agree to Degree: Comparing Graph Convolutional Networks in the Message-Passing FrameworkFloris Geerts, Filip Mazowiecki, Guillermo A. PérezICML 2021 · 42 citations
- Fine-grained Expressivity of Graph Neural NetworksJan Böker, Ron Levie, Ningyuan Huang, Soledad Villar et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 34 citations
- What Expressivity Theory Misses: Message Passing Complexity for GNNsNiklas Kemper, Tom Wollschläger, Stephan GünnemannNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
