STATUS Bench: A Rigorous Benchmark for Evaluating Object State Understanding in Vision-Language Models
Mahiro Ukai, Shuhei Kurita, Nakamasa Inoue
Abstract
Object state recognition aims to identify the specific condition of objects, such as their positional states (e.g., open or closed) and functional states (e.g., on or off). While recent Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are capable of performing a variety of multimodal tasks, it remains unclear how precisely they can identify object states. To alleviate this issue, we introduce the STAte and Transition UnderStanding Benchmark (STATUS Bench), the first benchmark for rigorously evaluating the ability of VLMs to understand subtle variations in object states in diverse situations. Specifically, STATUS Bench introduces a novel evaluation scheme that requires VLMs to perform three tasks simultaneously: object state identification (OSI), image retrieval (IR), and state change identification (SCI). These tasks are defined over our fully hand-crafted dataset involving image pairs, their corresponding object state descriptions and state change descriptions. Furthermore, we introduce a large-scale training dataset, namely STATUS Train, which consists of 13 million semi-automatically created descriptions. This dataset serves as the largest resource to facilitate further research in this area. In our experiments, we demonstrate that STATUS Bench enables rigorous consistency evaluation and reveal that current state-of-the-art VLMs still significantly struggle to capture subtle object state distinctions. Surprisingly, under the proposed rigorous evaluation scheme, most open-weight VLMs exhibited chance-level zero-shot performance. After fine-tuning on STATUS Train, Qwen2.5-VL achieved performance comparable to Gemini 2.0 Flash. These findings underscore the necessity of STATUS Bench and Train for advancing object state recognition in VLM research.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a02ebbe4-23f3-4509-a602-e11260457adbBuilds on14
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question AnsweringPan Lu, Swaroop Mishra, Tanglin Xia, Liang Qiu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 2,727 citations
- Robust Change CaptioningDong Huk Park, Trevor Darrell, Anna RohrbachICCV 2019 · 217 citations
- MMMU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIXiang Yue, Yuansheng Ni, Tianyu Zheng, Kai Zhang et al.CVPR 2024 · 213 citations
Related papers
- Vision-Language Models Do Not Understand NegationKumail Alhamoud, Shaden Alshammari, Yonglong Tian, Guohao Li et al.CVPR 2025
- VP-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Visual Prompting in Multimodal Large Language ModelsMingjie Xu, Jinpeng Chen, Yuzhi Zhao, Jason Chun Lok Li et al.AAAI 2026
- VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMsBrigitta Malagurski Törtei, Yasser Dahou, Ngoc Dung Huynh, Wamiq Reyaz Para et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- ProgressLM: Towards Progress Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsJianshu Zhang, Chengxuan Qian, Haosen Sun, Haoran Lu et al.ACL 2026 · 7 citations
- Logic Unseen: Revealing the Logical Blindspots of Vision-Language ModelsYuchen Zhou, Jiayu Tang, Shuo Yang, Xiaoyan Xiao et al.AAAI 2026 · 2 citations
