RICE: Breaking Through the Training Bottlenecks of Reinforcement Learning with Explanation
Zelei Cheng, Xian Wu, Jiahao Yu, Sabrina Yang, Gang Wang, Xinyu Xing
Abstract
Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is playing an increasingly important role in real-world applications. However, obtaining an optimally performing DRL agent for complex tasks, especially with sparse rewards, remains a significant challenge. The training of a DRL agent can be often trapped in a bottleneck without further progress. In this paper, we propose RICE, an innovative refining scheme for reinforcement learning that incorporates explanation methods to break through the training bottlenecks. The high-level idea of RICE is to construct a new initial state distribution that combines both the default initial states and critical states identified through explanation methods, thereby encouraging the agent to explore from the mixed initial states. Through careful design, we can theoretically guarantee that our refining scheme has a tighter sub-optimality bound. We evaluate RICE in various popular RL environments and real-world applications. The results demonstrate that RICE significantly outperforms existing refining schemes in enhancing agent performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a021c041-e76f-41d3-a465-f28e6718be83Cited by top-tier papers6
- A Snapshot of Influence: A Local Data Attribution Framework for Online Reinforcement LearningYuzheng Hu, Fan Wu, Haotian Ye, David A. Forsyth et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- GPO: Learning from Critical Steps to Improve LLM ReasoningJiahao Yu, Zelei Cheng, Xian Wu, Xinyu XingNeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
- Explainable Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback to Improve AlignmentShicheng Liu, Siyuan Xu, Wenjie Qiu, Hangfan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations
- UTILITY: Utilizing Explainable Reinforcement Learning to Improve Reinforcement LearningShicheng Liu, Minghui ZhuICLR 2025
- PaperBench: Evaluating AI's Ability to Replicate AI ResearchGiulio Starace, Oliver Jaffe, Dane Sherburn, James Aung et al.ICML 2025
Builds on14
- Bridging Offline Reinforcement Learning and Imitation Learning: A Tale of PessimismParia Rashidinejad, Banghua Zhu, Cong Ma, Jiantao Jiao et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 373 citations
- End-to-End Urban Driving by Imitating a Reinforcement Learning CoachZhejun Zhang, Alexander Liniger, Dengxin Dai, Fisher Yu et al.ICCV 2021 · 313 citations
- Policy Finetuning: Bridging Sample-Efficient Offline and Online Reinforcement LearningTengyang Xie, Nan Jiang, Huan Wang, Caiming Xiong et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 207 citations
- Jump-Start Reinforcement LearningIkechukwu Uchendu, Ted Xiao, Yao Lu, Banghua Zhu et al.ICML 2023 · 158 citations
- PC-PG: Policy Cover Directed Exploration for Provable Policy Gradient LearningAlekh Agarwal, Mikael Henaff, Sham M. Kakade, Wen SunNeurIPS 2020 · 126 citations
Related papers
- StateMask: Explaining Deep Reinforcement Learning through State MaskZelei Cheng, Xian Wu, Jiahao Yu, Wenhai Sun et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 24 citations
- Widening the Pipeline in Human-Guided Reinforcement Learning with Explanation and Context-Aware Data AugmentationLin Guan, Mudit Verma, Sihang Guo, Ruohan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 57 citations
- AIRS: Explanation for Deep Reinforcement Learning based Security ApplicationsJiahao Yu, Wenbo Guo, Qi Qin, Gang Wang et al.USENIX Security 2023
- CrystalBox: Future-Based Explanations for Input-Driven Deep RL SystemsSagar Patel, Sangeetha Abdu Jyothi, Nina NarodytskaAAAI 2024 · 1 citation
- Tell me why! Explanations support learning relational and causal structureAndrew K. Lampinen, Nicholas A. Roy, Ishita Dasgupta, Stephanie C. Y. Chan et al.ICML 2022 · 51 citations
