Revisiting EM-based Estimation for Locally Differentially Private Protocols
Yutong Ye, Tianhao Wang, Min Zhang, Dengguo Feng
Abstract
—This paper investigates the fundamental estimation problem in local differential privacy (LDP). We categorize existing estimation methods into two approaches, the unbiased estimation approach, which, under LDP, often gives unreasonable results (negative results or the sum of estimation does not equal to the total number of participating users), due to the excessive amount of noise added in LDP, and the maximal likelihood estimation (MLE)-based approach, which, can give reasonable results, but often suffers from the overfitting issue. To address this challenge, we propose a reduction framework inspired by Gaussian mixture models (GMM). We adapt the reduction framework to LDP estimation by transferring the estimation problem to the density estimation problem of the mixture model. Through the merging operation of the smallest weight component in this mixture model, the EM algorithm converges faster and produces a more robust distribution estimation. We show this framework offers a general and efficient way of modeling various LDP protocols. Through extensive evaluations, we demonstrate the superiority of our approach in terms of mean estimation, categorical distribution estimation, and numerical distribution estimation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9fa4bc49-eda9-4aeb-aa42-90bb12f1dc81Cited by top-tier papers3
- Augmented Shuffle Differential Privacy Protocols for Large-Domain Categorical and Key-Value DataTakao Murakami, Yuichi Sei, Reo EriguchiNDSS 2026 · 1 citation
- Estimating the True Distribution of Data Collected with Randomized ResponseCarlos Antonio Pinzón, Ehab ElSalamouny, Lucas Massot, Alexis Miller et al.AAAI 2026
- Robust Single-Message Shuffle Differential Privacy Protocol for Accurate Distribution EstimationXiaoguang Li, Hanyi Wang, Yaowei Huang, Jungang Yang et al.ICDE 2026
Builds on14
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Analysis of Graph StatisticsJacob Imola, Takao Murakami, Kamalika ChaudhuriUSENIX Security 2021 · 139 citations
- Estimating Numerical Distributions under Local Differential PrivacyZitao Li, Tianhao Wang, Milan Lopuhaä-Zwakenberg, Ninghui Li et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 115 citations
- Data Poisoning Attacks to Local Differential Privacy ProtocolsXiaoyu Cao, Jinyuan Jia, Neil Zhenqiang GongUSENIX Security 2021 · 100 citations
- Real-World Trajectory Sharing with Local Differential PrivacyTeddy Cunningham, Graham Cormode, Hakan Ferhatosmanoglu, Divesh SrivastavaVLDB 2021 · 72 citations
Related papers
- Privacy for Free: Leveraging Local Differential Privacy Perturbed Data from Multiple ServicesRong Du, Qingqing Ye, Yue Fu, Haibo HuVLDB 2025 · 2 citations
- PrivRM: A Framework for Range Mean Estimation under Local Differential PrivacyLiantong Yu, Qingqing Ye, Rong DuSIGMOD 2025 · 3 citations
- Locally Differentially Private Frequency Estimation Based on Convolution FrameworkHuiyu Fang, Liquan Chen, Yali Liu, Yuan GaoS&P 2023
- Minimax Risks and Optimal Procedures for Estimation under Functional Local Differential PrivacyBonwoo Lee, Jeongyoun Ahn, Cheolwoo ParkNeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
- Differential Aggregation against General Colluding AttackersRong Du, Qingqing Ye, Yue Fu, Haibo Hu et al.ICDE 2023 · 11 citations
