Reducing Task Load with an Embodied Intelligent Virtual Assistant for Improved Performance in Collaborative Decision Making
Kangsoo Kim, Celso M. de Melo, Nahal Norouzi, Gerd Bruder, Gregory F. Welch
Abstract
Collaboration in a group has the potential to achieve more effective solutions for challenging problems, but collaboration per se is not an easy task, rather a stressful burden if the collaboration partners do not communicate well with each other. While Intelligent Virtual Assistants (IVAs), such as Amazon Alexa, are becoming part of our daily lives, there are increasing occurrences in which we collaborate with such IVAs for our daily tasks. Although IVAs can provide important support to users, the limited verbal interface in the current state of IVAs lacks the ability to provide effective non-verbal social cues, which is critical for improving collaborative performance and reducing task load.In this paper, we investigate the effects of IVA embodiment on collaborative decision making. In a within-subjects study, participants performed a desert survival task in three conditions: (1) performing the task alone, (2) working with a disembodied voice assistant, and (3) working with an embodied assistant. Our results show that both assistant conditions led to higher performance over when performing the task alone, but interestingly the reported task load with the embodied assistant was significantly lower than with the disembodied voice assistant. We discuss the findings with implications for effective and efficient collaborations with IVAs while also emphasizing the increased social presence and richness of the embodied assistant.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 9f6d326b-84d1-4a09-b957-878b3ebb8ad6Cited by top-tier papers5
- Engaged and Affective Virtual Agents: Their Impact on Social Presence, Trustworthiness, and Decision-Making in the Group DiscussionHanseob Kim, Bin Han, Jieun Kim, Muhammad Firdaus Syawaludin Lubis et al.CHI 2024 · 34 citations
- FIXMYPOSE: Pose Correctional Captioning and RetrievalHyounghun Kim, Abhay Zala, Graham Burri, Mohit BansalAAAI 2021 · 22 citations
- Exploring Collaborative GenAI Agents in Synchronous Group Settings: Eliciting Team Perceptions and Design Considerations for the Future of WorkJanet G. Johnson, Macarena Peralta, Mansanjam Kaur, Ruijie Sophia Huang et al.CSCW 2025 · 16 citations
- Since U Been Gone: Augmenting Context-Aware Transcriptions for Re-Engaging in Immersive VR MeetingsGeonsun Lee, Yue Yang, Jennifer Healey, Dinesh ManochaCHI 2025 · 13 citations
- Hybridge: Bridging Spatiality for Inclusive and Equitable Hybrid MeetingsPayod Panda, Lev Tankelevitch, Becky Spittle, Kori Inkpen et al.CSCW 2024 · 11 citations
Related papers
- Exploring the Effects of Support Type and Task Difficulty for Virtual Assistants as Social CompanionsSei Kang, Yunsu Lee, Gun A. Lee, Hyung-Jeong Yang et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Exploring Mediation by an Embodied Virtual Agent in Immersive Triadic Collaborative Decision-MakingBinyang Han, Ze Dong, Jingjing Zhang, Ruoyu Wen et al.IEEE VR 2026
- Investigating the Impact of Voice-only and Embodied Conversational Virtual Agents on Mixed Reality Puzzle SolvingShirin Hajahmadi, Pasquale Cascarano, Fariba Mostajeran, Kevin Heuer et al.IEEE VR 2025 · 7 citations
- Comparing Referential Interactions with an Intelligent Assistant in Virtual RealityLina Kaschub, Bado Völckers, Ugur Turhan, Philipp Huesmann et al.IEEE VR 2026
- The Dominance Effect: How Verbal and Nonverbal Cues of Virtual Agents Influence Decision-Making in VRTaeyeon Kim, Hyeongil Nam, Sunghun Jung, Ahmad Fouad et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
