Investigating the Impact of Voice-only and Embodied Conversational Virtual Agents on Mixed Reality Puzzle Solving
Shirin Hajahmadi, Pasquale Cascarano, Fariba Mostajeran, Kevin Heuer, Anton Lux, Gil Otis Mends-Cole, Frank Steinicke, Gustavo Marfia
Abstract
Conversational Virtual Agents (CVAs) offer a promising approach for enhancing user task performance in Mixed Reality (MR) environments. This paper explores the integration of a CVA into an MR application designed to assist in solving a 2D physical puzzle, offering enhanced spatial cognitive capabilities. Using the CVA classification architecture and the MiRAS (Mixed Reality Agents) Cube Taxonomy, we developed an MR system with a state-aware assistant to guide users in a puzzle-solving task only when requested. The primary research question is whether or not the CVA needs to be embodied. We conducted a study with 34 participants to investigate the influence of Voice-only and Embodied CVAs on puzzle-solving performance, user interactions with the assistant, the assistant’s social presence, overall system cognitive workload, and users’ perceptions of future system use. Both modalities showed equivalent outcomes regarding the number of position- and orientation-related queries, perceived usability, message and affective understanding, performance, frustration, and usefulness. However, results showed that Voice-only CVA significantly enhanced task efficiency: participants completed puzzles more quickly and accurately, reporting lower effort than in the Embodied condition. These findings suggest that Voice-only CVAs may be more effective for tasks like puzzle solving, where auditory guidance alone appears sufficient to support better performance.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- Reducing Task Load with an Embodied Intelligent Virtual Assistant for Improved Performance in Collaborative Decision MakingKangsoo Kim, Celso M. de Melo, Nahal Norouzi, Gerd Bruder et al.IEEE VR 2020 · 22 citations
- A Comparison Study Understanding the Impact of Mixed Reality Collaboration on Sense of Co-PresenceJianing Yin, Weicheng Zheng, Yuntao Wang, Xin Tong et al.IEEE VR 2025 · 2 citations
- Using Virtual Replicas to Improve Mixed Reality Remote CollaborationHuayuan Tian, Gun A. Lee, Huidong Bai, Mark BillinghurstIEEE VR 2023 · 57 citations
- Do You Really Need to Know Where "That" Is? Enhancing Support for Referencing in Collaborative Mixed Reality EnvironmentsJanet G. Johnson, Danilo Gasques, Tommy Sharkey, Evan Schmitz et al.CHI 2021 · 28 citations
- Exploring Mediation by an Embodied Virtual Agent in Immersive Triadic Collaborative Decision-MakingBinyang Han, Ze Dong, Jingjing Zhang, Ruoyu Wen et al.IEEE VR 2026
