Task-Agnostic Undesirable Feature Deactivation Using Out-of-Distribution Data
Dongmin Park, Hwanjun Song, Minseok Kim, Jae-Gil Lee
Abstract
A deep neural network (DNN) has achieved great success in many machine learning tasks by virtue of its high expressive power. However, its prediction can be easily biased to undesirable features, which are not essential for solving the target task and are even imperceptible to a human, thereby resulting in poor generalization. Leveraging plenty of undesirable features in out-of-distribution (OOD) examples has emerged as a potential solution for de-biasing such features, and a recent study shows that softmax-level calibration of OOD examples can successfully remove the contribution of undesirable features to the last fully-connected layer of a classifier. However, its applicability is confined to the classification task, and its impact on a DNN feature extractor is not properly investigated. In this paper, we propose TAUFE, a novel regularizer that deactivates many undesirable features using OOD examples in the feature extraction layer and thus removes the dependency on the task-specific softmax layer. To show the task-agnostic nature of TAUFE, we rigorously validate its performance on three tasks, classification, regression, and a mix of them, on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, ImageNet, CUB200, and CAR datasets. The results demonstrate that TAUFE consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art method as well as the baselines without regularization.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9f3351f2-320d-4752-9d0a-da8fb8e82587Cited by top-tier papers4
- Robust Data Pruning under Label Noise via Maximizing Re-labeling AccuracyDongmin Park, Seola Choi, Doyoung Kim, Hwanjun Song et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 42 citations
- Meta-Query-Net: Resolving Purity-Informativeness Dilemma in Open-set Active LearningDongmin Park, Yooju Shin, Jihwan Bang, Youngjun Lee et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 37 citations
- Adaptive Shortcut Debiasing for Online Continual LearningDoyoung Kim, Dongmin Park, Yooju Shin, Jihwan Bang et al.AAAI 2024 · 5 citations
- OpenMix: Exploring Outlier Samples for Misclassification DetectionFei Zhu, Zhen Cheng, Xu-Yao Zhang, Cheng-Lin LiuCVPR 2023
Builds on8
- Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box RegressionZhaohui Zheng, Ping Wang, Wei Liu, Jinze Li et al.AAAI 2020 · 4,823 citations
- Energy-based Out-of-distribution DetectionWeitang Liu, Xiaoyun Wang, John D. Owens, Yixuan LiNeurIPS 2020 · 2,213 citations
- Learning De-biased Representations with Biased RepresentationsHyojin Bahng, Sanghyuk Chun, Sangdoo Yun, Jaegul Choo et al.ICML 2020 · 332 citations
- SRM: A Style-Based Recalibration Module for Convolutional Neural NetworksHyunJae Lee, Hyo-Eun Kim, Hyeonseob NamICCV 2019 · 286 citations
- Removing Undesirable Feature Contributions Using Out-of-Distribution DataSaehyung Lee, Changhwa Park, Hyungyu Lee, Jihun Yi et al.ICLR 2021 · 26 citations
Related papers
- EnD: Entangling and Disentangling Deep Representations for Bias CorrectionEnzo Tartaglione, Carlo Alberto Barbano, Marco GrangettoCVPR 2021
- Meta Dropout: Learning to Perturb Latent Features for GeneralizationHaebeom Lee, Taewook Nam, Eunho Yang, Sung Ju HwangICLR 2020 · 59 citations
- Improving Out-of-Distribution Detection with Disentangled Foreground and Background FeaturesChoubo Ding, Guansong PangACM MM 2024 · 1 citation
- Rethinking Out-of-Distribution Detection on Imbalanced Data DistributionKai Liu, Zhihang Fu, Sheng Jin, Chao Chen et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 9 citations
- DecAug: Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Decomposed Feature Representation and Semantic AugmentationHaoyue Bai, Rui Sun, Lanqing Hong, Fengwei Zhou et al.AAAI 2021 · 88 citations
