Inverse Preference Learning: Preference-based RL without a Reward Function
Joey Hejna, Dorsa Sadigh
Abstract
Reward functions are difficult to design and often hard to align with human intent. Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms address these problems by learning reward functions from human feedback. However, the majority of preference-based RL methods naïvely combine supervised reward models with off-the-shelf RL algorithms. Contemporary approaches have sought to improve performance and query complexity by using larger and more complex reward architectures such as transformers. Instead of using highly complex architectures, we develop a new and parameter-efficient algorithm, Inverse Preference Learning (IPL), specifically designed for learning from offline preference data. Our key insight is that for a fixed policy, the -function encodes all information about the reward function, effectively making them interchangeable. Using this insight, we completely eliminate the need for a learned reward function. Our resulting algorithm is simpler and more parameter-efficient. Across a suite of continuous control and robotics benchmarks, IPL attains competitive performance compared to more complex approaches that leverage transformer-based and non-Markovian reward functions while having fewer algorithmic hyperparameters and learned network parameters. Our code is publicly released.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9f24a6e6-4ae8-4a71-9098-16ca93d302feCited by top-tier papers43
- A Dense Reward View on Aligning Text-to-Image Diffusion with PreferenceShentao Yang, Tianqi Chen, Mingyuan ZhouICML 2024 · 53 citations
- Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without Reinforcement LearningJoey Hejna, Rafael Rafailov, Harshit Sikchi, Chelsea Finn et al.ICLR 2024 · 37 citations
- Imitating Language via Scalable Inverse Reinforcement LearningMarkus Wulfmeier, Michael Bloesch, Nino Vieillard, Arun Ahuja et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 26 citations
- Flow to Better: Offline Preference-based Reinforcement Learning via Preferred Trajectory GenerationZhilong Zhang, Yihao Sun, Junyin Ye, Tian-Shuo Liu et al.ICLR 2024 · 23 citations
- Optimal Design for Human Preference ElicitationSubhojyoti Mukherjee, Anusha Lalitha, Kousha Kalantari, Aniket Deshmukh et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 20 citations
Builds on16
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-LearningIlya Kostrikov, Ashvin Nair, Sergey LevineICLR 2022 · 1,402 citations
- PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-trainingKimin Lee, Laura M. Smith, Pieter AbbeelICML 2021 · 380 citations
- Implementation Matters in Deep RL: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOLogan Engstrom, Andrew Ilyas, Shibani Santurkar, Dimitris Tsipras et al.ICLR 2020 · 305 citations
Related papers
- Preference Transformer: Modeling Human Preferences using Transformers for RLChangyeon Kim, Jongjin Park, Jinwoo Shin, Honglak Lee et al.ICLR 2023 · 4 citations
- Policy-labeled Preference Learning: Is Preference Enough for RLHF?Taehyun Cho, Seokhun Ju, Seungyub Han, Dohyeong Kim et al.ICML 2025
- Inverse Reinforcement Learning in a Continuous State Space with Formal GuaranteesGregory Dexter, Kevin Bello, Jean HonorioNeurIPS 2021 · 9 citations
- A Unified Linear Programming Framework for Offline Reward Learning from Human Demonstrations and FeedbackKihyun Kim, Jiawei Zhang, Asuman E. Ozdaglar, Pablo A. ParriloICML 2024 · 2 citations
- Is Inverse Reinforcement Learning Harder than Standard Reinforcement Learning? A Theoretical PerspectiveLei Zhao, Mengdi Wang, Yu BaiICML 2024 · 3 citations
