Better Assumptions, Stronger Conclusions: The Case for Ordinal Regression in HCI
Brandon Victor Syiem, Eduardo Velloso
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of ordinal measures in HCI, such as Likert-items, there is little consensus among HCI researchers on the statistical methods used for analysing such data. Both parametric and non-parametric methods have been extensively used within the discipline, with limited reflection on their assumptions and appropriateness for such analyses. In this paper, we examine recent HCI works that report statistical analyses of ordinal measures. We highlight prevalent methods used, discuss their limitations and spotlight key assumptions and oversights that diminish the insights drawn from these methods. Finally, we champion and detail the use of cumulative link (mixed) models (CLM/CLMM) for analysing ordinal data. Further, we provide practical worked examples of applying CLM/CLMMs using R to published open-sourced datasets. This work contributes towards a better understanding of the statistical methods used to analyse ordinal data in HCI and helps to consolidate practices for future work.
• Human-centered computing → HCI design and evaluation methods.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on6
- An Aligned Rank Transform Procedure for Multifactor Contrast TestsLisa A. Elkin, Matthew Kay, James J. Higgins, Jacob O. WobbrockUIST 2021 · 671 citations
- The Effects of Generative AI on Design Fixation and Divergent ThinkingSamangi Wadinambiarachchi, Ryan M. Kelly, Saumya Pareek, Qiushi Zhou et al.CHI 2024 · 186 citations
- Watch This! Observational Learning in VR Promotes Better Far Transfer than Active Learning for a Fine Psychomotor TaskIsabel Sophie Fitton, Elizabeth Dark, Manoela Milena Oliveira da Silva, Jeremy Dalton et al.CHI 2024 · 14 citations
- Exploring the Association between Moral Foundations and Judgements of AI BehaviourJoe Brailsford, Frank Vetere, Eduardo VellosoCHI 2024 · 14 citations
- Placebo Effect of Control Settings in Feeds Are Not Always StrongSilas Hsu, Vinay Koshy, Kristen Vaccaro, Christian Sandvig et al.CHI 2025 · 6 citations
Related papers
- On the Computational Reproducibility of Human-Computer InteractionOlga Iarygina, Kasper Hornbæk, Aske MottelsonCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature ReviewRock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Solon Barocas et al.CHI 2025 · 51 citations
- A Critique of Electrodermal Activity Practices at CHIEbrahim Babaei, Benjamin Tag, Tilman Dingler, Eduardo VellosoCHI 2021 · 64 citations
- Transparency of CHI Research Artifacts: Results of a Self-Reported SurveyChat Wacharamanotham, Lukas Eisenring, Steve Haroz, Florian EchtlerCHI 2020 · 120 citations
- Beyond Binary Preferences: A Principled Framework for Reward Modeling with Ordinal FeedbackAmirhossein Afsharrad, Ruida Zhou, Luca Viano, Sanjay Lall et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
