Probing Linguistic Features of Sentence-Level Representations in Relation Extraction
Christoph Alt, Aleksandra Gabryszak, Leonhard Hennig
Abstract
Despite the recent progress, little is known about the features captured by state-of-the-art neural relation extraction (RE) models. Common methods encode the source sentence, conditioned on the entity mentions, before classifying the relation. However, the complexity of the task makes it difficult to understand how encoder architecture and supporting linguistic knowledge affect the features learned by the encoder. We introduce 14 probing tasks targeting linguistic properties relevant to RE, and we use them to study representations learned by more than 40 different encoder architecture and linguistic feature combinations trained on two datasets, TACRED and SemEval 2010 Task 8. We find that the bias induced by the architecture and the inclusion of linguistic features are clearly expressed in the probing task performance. For example, adding contextualized word representations greatly increases performance on probing tasks with a focus on named entity and part-of-speech information, and yields better results in RE. In contrast, entity masking improves RE, but considerably lowers performance on entity type related probing tasks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9ef8572d-9f50-4bfd-9c62-c244100a7e83Cited by top-tier papers2
- Why is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures in Visuolinguistic CompositionalityAnuj Diwan, Layne Berry, Eunsol Choi, David Harwath et al.EMNLP 2022 · 15 citations
- BenchIE: A Framework for Multi-Faceted Fact-Based Open Information Extraction EvaluationKiril Gashteovski, Mingying Yu, Bhushan Kotnis, Carolin Lawrence et al.ACL 2022
Related papers
- Learning from Context or Names? An Empirical Study on Neural Relation ExtractionHao Peng, Tianyu Gao, Xu Han, Yankai Lin et al.EMNLP 2020 · 185 citations
- Progressive Multi-task Learning with Controlled Information Flow for Joint Entity and Relation ExtractionKai Sun, Richong Zhang, Samuel Mensah, Yongyi Mao et al.AAAI 2021 · 50 citations
- A Latent-Variable Model for Intrinsic ProbingKarolina Stanczak, Lucas Torroba Hennigen, Adina Williams, Ryan Cotterell et al.AAAI 2023 · 6 citations
- MultiTACRED: A Multilingual Version of the TAC Relation Extraction DatasetLeonhard Hennig, Philippe Thomas, Sebastian MöllerACL 2023 · 4 citations
- LUKE: Deep Contextualized Entity Representations with Entity-aware Self-attentionIkuya Yamada, Akari Asai, Hiroyuki Shindo, Hideaki Takeda et al.EMNLP 2020 · 562 citations
