Constant-Factor EFX Exists for Chores
Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, John Qin
Abstract
We study the problem of fair allocation of chores among agents with additive preferences. In the discrete setting, envy-freeness up to any chore (EFX) has emerged as a compelling fairness criterion. However, establishing its (non-)existence or achieving a meaningful approximation remains a major open question in fair division. The current best guarantee is the existence of O(n 2 )-EFX allocations, where n denotes the number of agents, obtained through a sophisticated algorithm [61] . In this paper, we show the existence of 4-EFX allocations, providing the first constant-factor approximation of EFX. We further investigate the existence of allocations that are both fair and efficient, using Pareto optimality (PO) as our efficiency criterion. For the special case of bivalued instances, we establish the existence of allocations that are both 3-EFX and PO, thereby improving upon the current best factor of O(n)-EFX without any efficiency guarantees. For general additive instances, the existence of allocations that are α-EFk and PO has remained open for any constant values of α and k, where EFk denotes envy-freeness up to k chores. We provide the first positive result in this direction by showing the existence of allocations that are 2-EF2 and PO. Our results are obtained via a novel economic framework called earning restricted (ER) competitive equilibrium for fractional allocations, which imposes limits on the earnings of agents from each chore. We show the existence of ER equilibria by carefully formulating a linear complementarity problem (LCP) that captures all ER equilibria, and then prove that the classic complementary pivot algorithm applied to this LCP terminates at an ER equilibrium. By carefully setting earning limits and leveraging the properties of ER equilibria, we design algorithms that involve rounding the fractional solutions and then performing swaps and merges of bundles to meet the desired fairness and efficiency criteria. We expect that the concept of ER equilibrium will play a crucial role in deriving further results on related problems.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9ec28592-4c60-463e-9b96-981e856ce989Cited by top-tier papers5
- Existence of 2-EFX Allocations of ChoresJugal Garg, Aniket MurhekarAAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Probing EFX via PMMS: (Non-)Existence Results in Discrete Fair DivisionJaroslaw Byrka, Franciszek Malinka, Tomasz PonitkaAAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Existence of Fair and Efficient Allocation of Indivisible ChoresRyoga MaharaSODA 2026 · 1 citation
- Allocating Chores with Restricted Additive Costs: Achieving EFX, MMS, and Efficiency SimultaneouslyZehan Lin, Xiaowei Wu, Shengwei ZhouWWW 2026
- Centralized Group Equitability and Individual Envy-Freeness in the Allocation of Indivisible ItemsYing Wang, Jiaqian Li, Tianze Wei, Hau Chan et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on10
- Multiple Birds with One Stone: Beating 1/2 for EFX and GMMS via Envy Cycle EliminationGeorgios Amanatidis, Evangelos Markakis, Apostolos NtokosAAAI 2020 · 98 citations
- A Little Charity Guarantees Almost Envy-FreenessBhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Telikepalli Kavitha, Kurt Mehlhorn, Alkmini SgouritsaSODA 2020 · 97 citations
- Almost Full EFX Exists for Four AgentsBen Berger, Avi Cohen, Michal Feldman, Amos FiatAAAI 2022 · 74 citations
- Fair and Efficient Allocations of Chores under Bivalued PreferencesJugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, John QinAAAI 2022 · 63 citations
- Almost (Weighted) Proportional Allocations for Indivisible Chores✱✱Bo Li, Yingkai Li, Xiaowei WuWWW 2022 · 46 citations
Related papers
- EFX and PO Allocation Exists for Two Types of GoodsVladimir Davidiuk, Yuriy Dementiev, Artur Ignatiev, Danil SagunovAAAI 2026
- Almost Envy-Free Allocations of Indivisible Goods or Chores with EntitlementsMax Springer, MohammadTaghi Hajiaghayi, Hadi YamiAAAI 2024
- On Optimal Tradeoffs between EFX and Nash WelfareMichal Feldman, Simon Mauras, Tomasz PonitkaAAAI 2024 · 20 citations
- EF2X Exists for Four AgentsArash Ashuri, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Alkmini SgouritsaAAAI 2025 · 1 citation
- Achieving Maximin Share and EFX/EF1 Guarantees SimultaneouslyHannaneh Akrami, Nidhi RathiAAAI 2025 · 9 citations
