EF2X Exists for Four Agents
Arash Ashuri, Vasilis Gkatzelis, Alkmini Sgouritsa
Abstract
We study the fair allocation of indivisible goods among a group of agents, aiming to limit the envy between any two agents. The central open problem in this literature, which has proven to be extremely challenging, is regarding the existence of an EFX allocation, i.e., an allocation such that any envy from some agent i toward another agent j would vanish if we were to remove any single good from the bundle allocated to j. Prior work has shown that when the agents’ valuations are additive, which has been the main focus of prior works, an EFX allocation is guaranteed to exist for all instances involving up to three agents. Subsequent work extended this guarantee to more general valuations, like nice-cancelable and MMS-feasible. However, the existence of EFX allocations for instances involving four agents remains open, even for additive valuations. We contribute to this literature by focusing on EF2X, a relaxation of EFX which requires that any envy toward some agent would vanish if any two of the goods allocated to that agent were to be removed. Our main result shows that EF2X allocations exist for any instance with four agents, even for the class of cancelable valuations, which is more general than additive. Our proof is constructive, proposing an algorithm that computes such an allocation in pseudo-polynomial time. Furthermore, for instances involving three agents we provide an algorithm that computes an EF2X allocation in polynomial time, in contrast to EFX for which the fastest known algorithm for three agents is only pseudo-polynomial.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d53b380e-2f16-41ff-ae55-69a17429afc2Builds on7
- Multiple Birds with One Stone: Beating 1/2 for EFX and GMMS via Envy Cycle EliminationGeorgios Amanatidis, Evangelos Markakis, Apostolos NtokosAAAI 2020 · 98 citations
- A Little Charity Guarantees Almost Envy-FreenessBhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Telikepalli Kavitha, Kurt Mehlhorn, Alkmini SgouritsaSODA 2020 · 97 citations
- Almost Full EFX Exists for Four AgentsBen Berger, Avi Cohen, Michal Feldman, Amos FiatAAAI 2022 · 74 citations
- Fair and Efficient Allocations under Lexicographic PreferencesHadi Hosseini, Sujoy Sikdar, Rohit Vaish, Lirong XiaAAAI 2021 · 33 citations
- Almost Envy-freeness, Envy-rank, and Nash Social Welfare MatchingsAlireza Farhadi, Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi, Mohamad Latifian, Masoud Seddighin et al.AAAI 2021 · 27 citations
Related papers
- (Almost Full) EFX for Three (and More) Types of AgentsPratik Ghosal, Vishwa Prakash HV, Prajakta Nimbhorkar, Nithin VarmaAAAI 2025 · 9 citations
- EFX and PO Allocation Exists for Two Types of GoodsVladimir Davidiuk, Yuriy Dementiev, Artur Ignatiev, Danil SagunovAAAI 2026
- Finding Fair Allocations under Budget ConstraintsSiddharth Barman, Arindam Khan, Sudarshan Shyam, K. V. N. SreenivasAAAI 2023 · 20 citations
- Fair allocation of a multiset of indivisible itemsPranay Gorantla, Kunal Marwaha, Santhoshini VelusamySODA 2023 · 13 citations
- Understanding EFX Allocations: Counting and VariantsTzeh Yuan Neoh, Nicholas TehAAAI 2025 · 4 citations
