A Token-level Reference-free Hallucination Detection Benchmark for Free-form Text Generation
Tianyu Liu, Yizhe Zhang, Chris Brockett, Yi Mao, Zhifang Sui, Weizhu Chen, Bill Dolan
Abstract
Large pretrained generative models like GPT-3 often suffer from hallucinating non-existent or incorrect content, which undermines their potential merits in real applications. Existing work usually attempts to detect these hallucinations based on a corresponding oracle reference at a sentence or document level. However ground-truth references may not be readily available for many free-form text generation applications, and sentence-or document-level detection may fail to provide the fine-grained signals that would prevent fallacious content in real time. As a first step to addressing these issues, we propose a novel token-level, reference-free hallucination detection task and an associated annotated dataset named HADES (HAllucination DEtection dataSet) 1 . To create this dataset, we first perturb a large number of text segments extracted from English language Wikipedia, and then verify these with crowdsourced annotations. To mitigate label imbalance during annotation, we utilize an iterative model-in-loop strategy. We conduct comprehensive data analyses and create multiple baseline models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9e87cd77-538d-4b02-912e-00d21c33ee96Cited by top-tier papers34
- SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language ModelsPotsawee Manakul, Adian Liusie, Mark J. F. GalesEMNLP 2023 · 331 citations
- FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill SetsSeonghyeon Ye, Doyoung Kim, Sungdong Kim, Hyeonbin Hwang et al.ICLR 2024 · 176 citations
- CLIFF: Contrastive Learning for Improving Faithfulness and Factuality in Abstractive SummarizationShuyang Cao, Lu WangEMNLP 2021 · 130 citations
- Fast Adversarial Attacks on Language Models In One GPU MinuteVinu Sankar Sadasivan, Shoumik Saha, Gaurang Sriramanan, Priyatham Kattakinda et al.ICML 2024 · 85 citations
- Learning to Complete Code with SketchesDaya Guo, Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Jian Yin, Nan Duan et al.ICLR 2022 · 42 citations
Builds on15
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language UnderstandingYixin Nie, Adina Williams, Emily Dinan, Mohit Bansal et al.ACL 2020 · 602 citations
- Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of SummariesAlex Wang, Kyunghyun Cho, Mike LewisACL 2020 · 317 citations
- Optimizing the Factual Correctness of a Summary: A Study of Summarizing Radiology ReportsYuhao Zhang, Derek Merck, Emily Bao Tsai, Christopher D. Manning et al.ACL 2020 · 160 citations
Related papers
- HalLoc: Token-level Localization of Hallucinations for Vision Language ModelsEunkyu Park, Minyeong Kim, Gunhee KimCVPR 2025
- Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger FocusTianhang Zhang, Lin Qiu, Qipeng Guo, Cheng Deng et al.EMNLP 2023 · 18 citations
- The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Jie Chen, Ruiyang Ren, Xiaoxue Cheng et al.ACL 2024 · 49 citations
- ANAH: Analytical Annotation of Hallucinations in Large Language ModelsZiwei Ji, Yuzhe Gu, Wenwei Zhang, Chengqi Lyu et al.ACL 2024 · 8 citations
- ZINA: Multimodal Fine-grained Hallucination Detection and EditingYuiga Wada, Kazuki Matsuda, Komei Sugiura, Graham NeubigCVPR 2026 · 5 citations
