No More Head-Turning: Exploring Passthrough Techniques for Addressing Rear Interruptions from the Front in VR
Zixuan Guo, Yuekai Shi, Tiantian Ye, Tingjie Wan, Hai-Ning Liang
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) users often encounter interruptions, posing challenges to maintaining real-world awareness during immersive experiences. The Passthrough feature in VR headsets allows users to view their physical surroundings without removing the headset. However, when interruptions come from the rear, users need to turn their heads to see the real world, which can lead to negative experiences in VR. Study 1, conducted through semi-structured interviews involving 13 participants, found that users are less likely to use Passthrough for rear interruptions due to large head-turning movements, which cause inconvenience, increase the risk of motion sickness, and reduce the experience. Building on these findings, we introduced three Passthrough techniques in Study 2 for displaying the rear view in front of the user: Full Rear Passthrough + Pause (FRPP), Rear Passthrough Window (RPW), and Rear Passthrough AR (RPAR). Compared to the Baseline method that requires head-turning, all three systems reduced physical and temporal demands, alleviated disorientation caused by motion sickness, and provided a better user experience for managing rear interruptions. Among these, FRPP and RPAR were the most preferred. These findings provide valuable insights for future VR design, emphasizing the need for solutions that effectively manage rear interruptions while maintaining user comfort and experience.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9df091eb-d451-407b-8c30-1614a4db7166Builds on11
- Effect of Frame Rate on User Experience, Performance, and Simulator Sickness in Virtual RealityJialin Wang, Rongkai Shi, Wenxuan Zheng, Weijie Xie et al.IEEE VR 2023 · 169 citations
- Using Thematic Analysis in Healthcare HCI at CHI: A Scoping ReviewRobert Bowman, Camille Nadal, Kellie Morrissey, Anja Thieme et al.CHI 2023 · 106 citations
- Bad Breakdowns, Useful Seams, and Face Slapping: Analysis of VR Fails on YouTubeEmily Dao, Andreea Muresan, Kasper Hornbæk, Jarrod KnibbeCHI 2021 · 69 citations
- Promoting Reality Awareness in Virtual Reality through ProxemicsDaniel Medeiros, Rafael Kuffner dos Anjos, Nadia Pantidi, Kun Huang et al.IEEE VR 2021 · 56 citations
- Re-Evaluating VR User Awareness Needs During Bystander InteractionsJoseph O'Hagan, Julie R. Williamson, Florian Mathis, Mohamed Khamis et al.CHI 2023 · 43 citations
Related papers
- Perspective-Correct VR Passthrough Without ReprojectionGrace Kuo, Eric Penner, Seth Moczydlowski, Alexander Ching et al.SIGGRAPH 2023 · 11 citations
- SwitchAR: Perceptual Manipulations in Augmented RealityJonas Wombacher, Zhipeng Li, Jan GugenheimerUIST 2025 · 1 citation
- "Through the Looking Glass, and What We Found There": A Comprehensive Study of User Experiences with Pass-Through Devices in Everyday ActivitiesDaeWook Kim, Yewon Min, Jae-Yeop Jeong, Sehee Han et al.CHI 2025 · 5 citations
- Peripheral Teleportation: A Rest Frame Design to Mitigate Cybersickness During Virtual LocomotionTongyu Nie, Courtney Hutton Pospick, Ville Cantory, Danhua Zhang et al.IEEE VR 2025 · 7 citations
- WalkingVibe: Reducing Virtual Reality Sickness and Improving Realism while Walking in VR using Unobtrusive Head-mounted Vibrotactile FeedbackYi-Hao Peng, Carolyn Yu, Shi-Hong Liu, Chung-Wei Wang et al.CHI 2020 · 75 citations
