Censoring with Plausible Deniability: Asymmetric Local Privacy for Multi-Category CDF Estimation
Qirui Hu, Yi Liu
Abstract
We introduce a new mechanism within the Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy (ULDP) framework that enables censoring with plausible deniability when collecting and analyzing sensitive data. Our approach addresses scenarios where certain values, such as large numerical responses, are more privacy-sensitive than others, while accompanying categorical information may not be private on its own but could still be identifying. The mechanism selectively withholds identifying details when a response might indicate sensitive content, offering asymmetric privacy protection. Unlike previous methods, it avoids the need to predefine an exact sensitive region, making it more adaptable and practical. Although the mechanism is designed for ULDP, it can also be applied under symmetric LDP settings, where it still benefits from censoring and reduced perturbation cost. We provide theoretical guarantees, including uniform consistency and pointwise weak convergence results. Numerical experiments on both synthetic data and real-world data demonstrate the validity of the proposed methodology.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9d932cfc-6a90-4fdc-9666-226726625c17Builds on9
- Locally Differentially Private Protocols for Frequency EstimationTianhao Wang, Jeremiah Blocki, Ninghui Li, Somesh JhaUSENIX Security 2017 · 629 citations
- Estimating Numerical Distributions under Local Differential PrivacyZitao Li, Tianhao Wang, Milan Lopuhaä-Zwakenberg, Ninghui Li et al.SIGMOD 2020 · 115 citations
- Utility-Optimized Local Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Distribution EstimationTakao Murakami, Yusuke KawamotoUSENIX Security 2019 · 111 citations
- On the Risks of Collecting Multidimensional Data Under Local Differential PrivacyHéber Hwang Arcolezi, Sébastien Gambs, Jean-François Couchot, Catuscia PalamidessiVLDB 2023 · 22 citations
- Where Are the Red Lines? Towards Ethical Server-Side Scans in Security and Privacy ResearchFlorian Hantke, Sebastian Roth, Rafael Mrowczynski, Christine Utz et al.S&P 2024 · 17 citations
Related papers
- Addressing Sensitivity Distinction in Local Differential Privacy: A General Utility-Optimized FrameworkXingyu He, Youwen Zhu, Rongke Liu, Gaoning Pan et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Collecting and Analyzing Data Jointly from Multiple Services under Local Differential PrivacyMin Xu, Bolin Ding, Tianhao Wang, Jingren ZhouVLDB 2020 · 22 citations
- Enhancing Local Differential Privacy Accuracy by Exploiting Inherent UncertaintyPeng Tang, Xiya Shao, Rui Chen, Ning Wang et al.SIGMOD 2026
- ABC: Numerical Data Collection Under Local Differential Privacy Without Prior KnowledgeIncheol Baek, Hyungbin Kim, Yon Dohn ChungICDE 2026
- Context Aware Local Differential PrivacyJayadev Acharya, Kallista A. Bonawitz, Peter Kairouz, Daniel Ramage et al.ICML 2020 · 49 citations
