Collaboration, Invisible Work, and The Costs of Macrotask Freelancing
Srihari Hulikal Muralidhar, Sean Rintel, Siddharth Suri
Abstract
Online labour platforms promise efficient, low-friction matching of workers with clients at scale and ondemand. Prior studies on Upwork have shown that the combination of specialized knowledge and expertise, high autonomy, and extent of client-worker engagement makes macrotasks a unique category of 'on-demand' work. However, there is a need to unpack the nature of macrotask work from the freelancers' perspective. Based on a qualitative study of 21 freelancers on Upwork, this paper fills this important gap by delineating how freelancers reason about accomplishing macrotasks, their interaction with clients, the key challenges that they face in various stages of the work process, and the strategies they devise to mitigate the costs and overhead. This paper shows that freelancers perceive accomplishing macrotasks as a collaborative achievement with the client. It also demonstrates that the skill-intensive nature of tasks implies that matching freelancer with the task/client is of enormous importance. It describes three programmatic solutions that the platform offers to facilitate the matching process along with their benefits and limitations. It, then, shows how freelancers seek to minimize the costs and work associated with matching and collaboration through repeat hiring along the benefits they result in. Lastly, the paper highlights how the same set of core issues is mirrored for both the freelancer and client sides of the market, which need to be addressed in order to enhance the ease and effectiveness of client-freelancer collaboration. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Opening Up Human-Robot CollaborationStuart Reeves, Hannah R. M. Pelikan, Marina N. CantaruttiCSCW 2025 · 11 citations
- Design Tensions in Online Freelancing Platforms: Using Speculative Participatory Design to Support Freelancers' Relationships with ClientsJessica Huang, Ning F. Ma, Veronica A. Rivera, Tabreek Somani et al.CSCW 2024 · 9 citations
- Fulfillment of the Work Games: Warehouse Workers' Experiences with Algorithmic ManagementEunjeong Cheon, Ingrid EricksonCSCW 2025 · 6 citations
- Co-Designing Collaborative Generative AI Tools for FreelancersKashif Imteyaz, Michael Muller, Claudia Flores-Saviaga, Saiph SavageCHI 2026 · 4 citations
- "Better Ask for Forgiveness than Permission": Practices and Policies of AI Disclosure in Freelance WorkAngel Hsing-Chi Hwang, Senya Wong, Baixiao Chen, Jessica He et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on2
- Making it Work, or Not: A Longitudinal Study of Career Trajectories Among Online FreelancersAllie Blaising, Yasmine Kotturi, Chinmay Kulkarni, Laura DabbishCSCW 2020 · 55 citations
- Stuck in the middle with you: The Transaction Costs of Corporate Employees Hiring FreelancersCaitlin Lustig, Sean Rintel, Liane Scult, Siddharth SuriCSCW 2020 · 21 citations
Related papers
- "Why lose control?" A Study of Freelancers' Experiences with Gig Economy PlatformsJuan Carlos Alvarez de la Vega, Marta E. Cecchinato, John RooksbyCHI 2021 · 55 citations
- Understanding Platform Mediated Work-Life: A Diary Study with Gig Economy FreelancersJuan Carlos Alvarez de la Vega, Marta E. Cecchinato, John Rooksby, Joseph W. NewboldCSCW 2023 · 41 citations
- Cooperation in the Gig Economy: Insights from Upwork FreelancersZachary Fulker, Christoph RiedlCSCW 2024 · 16 citations
- Managing the Transition to Online Freelance Platforms: Self-Directed SocializationAllie Blaising, Laura DabbishCSCW 2022 · 28 citations
- Tasks of a Different Color: How Crowdsourcing Practices Differ per Complex Task Type and Why This MattersYihong Wang, Konstantinos Papangelis, Ioanna Lykourentzou, Michael Saker et al.CHI 2023 · 2 citations
