Co-Designing Collaborative Generative AI Tools for Freelancers
Kashif Imteyaz, Michael Muller, Claudia Flores-Saviaga, Saiph Savage
Abstract
and UNAM, Mexico Fig. 1. Overview of our study for co-designing collaborative generative AI tools for freelancers.
Most generative AI tools prioritize individual productivity and personalization, with limited support for collaboration. Designed for traditional workplaces, these tools do not fit freelancers' short-term teams or lack of shared institutional support, which can worsen their isolation and overlook freelancing platform dynamics. This mismatch means that, instead of empowering freelancers, current generative AI tools could reinforce existing precarity and make freelancer collaboration harder. To investigate how to design generative AI tools to support freelancer collaboration, we conducted co-design sessions with 27 freelancers. A key concern that emerged was the risk of AI systems compromising their creative agency and work identities when collaborating, especially when AI tools could reproduce content without attribution, threatening the authenticity and distinctiveness of their collaborative work.
Freelancers proposed "auxiliary AI" systems, human-guided tools that support their creative agencies and identities, allowing for flexible freelancer-led collaborations that promote "productive friction". Drawing on Marcuse's concept of technological rationality, we argue that freelancers are resisting one-dimensional, efficiency-driven AI, and instead envisioning technologies that preserve their collective creative agencies. We conclude with design recommendations for collaborative generative AI tools for freelancers.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Collaborative and social computing systems and tools.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 04ed817c-c184-432a-a7d1-5a06b5731fcdBuilds on49
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- "Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work": Data Cascades in High-Stakes AINithya Sambasivan, Shivani Kapania, Hannah Highfill, Diana Akrong et al.CHI 2021 · 725 citations
- The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge WorkersHao-Ping (Hank) Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos et al.CHI 2025 · 690 citations
- Expanding Explainability: Towards Social Transparency in AI systemsUpol Ehsan, Q. Vera Liao, Michael J. Muller, Mark O. Riedl et al.CHI 2021 · 505 citations
Related papers
- Development in times of hype: How freelancers explore Generative AI?Mateusz Dolata, Norbert Lange, Gerhard SchwabeICSE 2024 · 14 citations
- Exploring the Impact of AI-powered Creativity Support Tools on Professional Creative WorkflowsCaterina Moruzzi, Charlotte Bird, Laura Mariah HermanCSCW 2026
- A Potential Teammate?: Understanding How Indie Game Developers Approach Generative AI's Involvement in Their Small-Scale Creative TeamworkRuchi Panchanadikar, Guo FreemanCHI 2026 · 1 citation
- Understanding Nonlinear Collaboration between Human and AI Agents: A Co-design Framework for Creative DesignJiayi Zhou, Renzhong Li, Junxiu Tang, Tan Tang et al.CHI 2024 · 100 citations
- The Effects of Generative AI on Design Fixation and Divergent ThinkingSamangi Wadinambiarachchi, Ryan M. Kelly, Saumya Pareek, Qiushi Zhou et al.CHI 2024 · 186 citations
