CrossFire: An Analysis of Firefox Extension-Reuse Vulnerabilities
Ahmet Salih Buyukkayhan, Kaan Onarlioglu, William K. Robertson, Engin Kirda
Abstract
Extension architectures of popular web browsers have been carefully studied by the research community; however, the security impact of interactions between different extensions installed on a given system has received comparatively little attention. In this paper, we consider the impact of the lack of isolation between traditional Firefox browser extensions, and identify a novel extension-reuse vulnerability that allows adversaries to launch stealthy attacks against users. This attack leverages capability leaks from legitimate extensions to avoid the inclusion of security-sensitive API calls within the malicious extension itself, rendering extensions that use this technique difficult to detect through the manual vetting process that underpins the security of the Firefox extension ecosystem. We then present CROSSFIRE, a lightweight static analyzer to detect instances of extension-reuse vulnerabilities. CROSSFIRE uses a multi-stage static analysis to efficiently identify potential capability leaks in vulnerable, benign extensions. If a suspected vulnerability is identified, CROSSFIRE then produces a proof-ofconcept exploit instance -or, alternatively, an exploit template that can be adapted to rapidly craft a working attack that validates the vulnerability. To ascertain the prevalence of extension-reuse vulnerabilities, we performed a detailed analysis of the top 10 Firefox extensions, and ran further experiments on a random sample drawn from the top 2,000. The results indicate that popular extensions, downloaded by millions of users, contain numerous exploitable extension-reuse vulnerabilities. A case study also provides anecdotal evidence that malicious extensions exploiting extension-reuse vulnerabilities are indeed effective at cloaking themselves from extension vetters. Permission to freely reproduce all or part of this paper for noncommercial purposes is granted provided that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Reproduction for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of the Internet Society, the first-named author (for reproduction of an entire paper only), and the author's employer if the paper was prepared within the scope of employment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9b5d42cc-17a3-4005-aad2-efbee4d7f4f8Cited by top-tier papers4
- Extension Breakdown: Security Analysis of Browsers Extension Resources Control PoliciesIskander Sánchez-Rola, Igor Santos, Davide BalzarottiUSENIX Security 2017 · 67 citations
- Latex Gloves: Protecting Browser Extensions from Probing and Revelation AttacksAlexander Sjösten, Steven Van Acker, Pablo Picazo-Sanchez, Andrei SabelfeldNDSS 2019 · 36 citations
- CoCo: Efficient Browser Extension Vulnerability Detection via Coverage-guided, Concurrent Abstract InterpretationJianjia Yu, Song Li, Junmin Zhu, Yinzhi CaoCCS 2023 · 6 citations
- Carnus: Exploring the Privacy Threats of Browser Extension FingerprintingSoroush Karami, Panagiotis Ilia, Konstantinos Solomos, Jason PolakisNDSS 2020
Related papers
- DoubleX: Statically Detecting Vulnerable Data Flows in Browser Extensions at ScaleAurore Fass, Dolière Francis Somé, Michael Backes, Ben StockCCS 2021 · 35 citations
- Mystique: Uncovering Information Leakage from Browser ExtensionsQuan Chen, Alexandros KapravelosCCS 2018 · 88 citations
- You've Changed: Detecting Malicious Browser Extensions through their Update DeltasNikolaos Pantelaios, Nick Nikiforakis, Alexandros KapravelosCCS 2020 · 34 citations
- The Dangers of Human Touch: Fingerprinting Browser Extensions through User ActionsKonstantinos Solomos, Panagiotis Ilia, Soroush Karami, Nick Nikiforakis et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Everyone is Different: Client-side Diversification for Defending Against Extension FingerprintingErik Trickel, Oleksii Starov, Alexandros Kapravelos, Nick Nikiforakis et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 43 citations
