A Critical Examination of Virtual Reality Technology in the Context of the Minority Body
Kathrin Gerling, Katta Spiel
Abstract
Virtual Reality (VR) holds the promise of immersing people in virtual worlds. However, initial work on the relationship between VR and disability suggests that VR is a body-centric technology that poses barriers for disabled users. We supplement this work with a theoretical analysis of immersive VR through the lens of Surrogate Body theory, a concept from media theory for the structured examination of interactive media in use. Leveraging Critical Disability Studies, particularly the theory of the Minority Body, we explore the assumptions about bodies inherent in VR, and we reflect on implications of these assumptions when disabled people engage with the technology. Our findings show that VR is an inherently ableist technology that assumes a ‘corporeal standard’ (i.e., an ‘ideal’, non-disabled human body), and fails to adequately accommodate disabled people. We conclude with implications for HCI research on VR, and discuss design approaches that foster inclusive technology development.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9b52bbfc-bb61-46ab-9e52-3fda79921df8Cited by top-tier papers9
- Beyond Being Real: A Sensorimotor Control Perspective on Interactions in Virtual RealityParastoo Abtahi, Sidney Q. Hough, James A. Landay, Sean FollmerCHI 2022 · 60 citations
- Longing to be the Mountain: A Scoping Review about Nature-Centric, Health-Minded TechnologiesVelvet Spors, Samuli Laato, Oguz 'Oz' Buruk, Juho HamariCHI 2023 · 48 citations
- Understanding How People with Limited Mobility Use Multi-Modal InputJohann Wentzel, Sasa Junuzovic, James Devine, John R. Porter et al.CHI 2022 · 29 citations
- Asleep at the Virtual Wheel: The Increasing Inaccessibility of Virtual Reality ApplicationsCraig Anderton, Chris Creed, Sayan Sarcar, Arthur TheilCHI 2025 · 10 citations
- The Cadaver in the Machine: The Social Practices of Measurement and Validation in Motion Capture TechnologyEmma Harvey, Hauke Sandhaus, Abigail Z. Jacobs, Emanuel Moss et al.CHI 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Exclusion Rates among Disabled and Older Users of Virtual and Augmented RealityRosella P. Galindo Esparza, John J. Dudley, Vanja Garaj, Per Ola KristenssonCHI 2025 · 4 citations
- Observations on Virtual Reality Avatar Alignment with Research Participants' Skin Tone and GenderKristin A. Bartlett, Claudia KrogmeierIEEE VR 2025 · 5 citations
- Inclusive Avatar Guidelines for People with Disabilities: Supporting Disability Representation in Social Virtual RealityKexin Zhang, Edward Glenn Scott Spencer, Abijith Manikandan, Andric Li et al.CHI 2025 · 22 citations
- A Critical Review of Sexuality, Technology and DisabilityDilisha Patel, Ekat Osipova, Katta Spiel, Giulia BarbareschiCHI 2025 · 12 citations
- Rhetoric vs Responsibility: How Tech Companies Shape AI for AccessibilityAparajita S. Marathe, Quan Zhou, Achi Mishra, Anne Marie PiperCHI 2026 · 2 citations
