CyclicReflex: Improving Reasoning Models via Cyclical Reflection Token Scheduling
Chongyu Fan, Yihua Zhang, Jinghan Jia, Alfred O. Hero, Sijia Liu
Abstract
Large reasoning models (LRMs), such as OpenAI's o1 and DeepSeek-R1, harness test-time scaling to perform multi-step reasoning for complex problem-solving. This reasoning process, executed before producing final answers, is often guided by special juncture tokens that prompt self-evaluative reflection. These transition markers and reflective cues are referred to as "reflection tokens" (e.g., "wait", "but", "alternatively"). In this work, we treat reflection tokens as a "resource" and introduce the problem of resource allocation, aimed at improving the testtime compute performance of LRMs by adaptively regulating the frequency and placement of reflection tokens. Through empirical analysis, we show that both excessive and insufficient use of reflection tokens, referred to as over-reflection and under-reflection, can degrade model performance. To better understand this trade-off, we draw an analogy between reflection token usage and learning rate scheduling in optimization. Building on this insight, We propose cyclical reflection token scheduling (termed CyclicReflex), a training-free decoding strategy that dynamically modulates reflection token logits with a bidirectional, positiondependent triangular waveform, incurring no additional computation cost. Experiments on MATH500, AIME2024/2025, AMC2023, GPQA Diamond and Live-CodeBench demonstrate that CyclicReflex consistently improves performance across model sizes (1.5B-14B), outperforming standard decoding and recent approaches such as TIP (thought switching penalty) and S1. Codes are available at https://github.com/OPTML-Group/CyclicReflex .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
- Language Agent Tree Search Unifies Reasoning, Acting, and Planning in Language ModelsAndy Zhou, Kai Yan, Michal Shlapentokh-Rothman, Haohan Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 443 citations
Related papers
- Demystifying Reasoning Dynamics with Mutual Information: Thinking Tokens are Information Peaks in LLM ReasoningChen Qian, Dongrui Liu, Haochen Wen, Zhen Bai et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 63 citations
- Thoughts Are All Over the Place: On the Underthinking of Long Reasoning ModelsYue Wang, Qiuzhi Liu, Jiahao Xu, Tian Liang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Stop Unnecessary Reflection: Training LRMs for Efficient Reasoning with Adaptive Reflection and Length Coordinated PenaltyZewei Yu, Lirong Gao, Yuke Zhu, Bo Zheng et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Efficient Reasoning for Large Reasoning Language Models via Certainty-Guided Reflection SuppressionJiameng Huang, Baijiong Lin, Guhao Feng, Jierun Chen et al.AAAI 2026 · 21 citations
- Stop When Enough: Adaptive Early-Stopping for Chain-of-Thought ReasoningRenliang Sun, Wei Cheng, Dawei Li, Haifeng Chen et al.ACL 2026 · 11 citations
