Reconstruction Outcomes Look Similar but Processes Differ: Improving Context Consistency and Coverage in Graph Masked Auto-Encoder
Geng Tang, Keyu Liu, Xibei Yang, Yuhua Qian
Abstract
Graph Masked Auto-Encoder (GMAE) has emerged as a prevalent self-supervised paradigm, showing superior performance in graph learning. However, existing methods mainly emphasize reconstruction outcomes and give limited specification to how neighborhood context is used for reconstruction. Our experimental investigation shows that, even when reconstruction outcomes are similar, the ways of using neighborhood context differ substantially, resulting in performance shifts. To address this issue, we propose Consistency-and Coverage-aware Graph Masked Auto-Encoder (C2-GMAE), which encourages more consistent use of neighborhood context and promotes broader training coverage in the graph. Specifically, C2-GMAE leverages positional encoding as an observable structural reference, introduces density-partitioned masking to improve coverage across regions, and amplifies heterophilic edges to reduce the attenuation of discriminative relational information during reconstruction. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that C2-GMAE improves downstream performance against GMAE baselines.
Improving Context Consistency and Coverage in Graph Masked Auto-Encoder (a) Similar outcomes, different usage of context (b) Similar outcomes, different masks (c) Limited coverage in hard regions Easy region Hard region Loss reduction Mask Higher weight Context edge
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 9a3fd9c2-15c4-49c8-9bea-b806511d078bBuilds on25
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- Graph Contrastive Learning with AugmentationsYuning You, Tianlong Chen, Yongduo Sui, Ting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,042 citations
- Contrastive Multi-View Representation Learning on GraphsKaveh Hassani, Amir Hosein Khas AhmadiICML 2020 · 1,663 citations
- Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional NetworksHongbin Pei, Bingzhe Wei, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Yu Lei et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,445 citations
- InfoGraph: Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Graph-Level Representation Learning via Mutual Information MaximizationFan-Yun Sun, Jordan Hoffmann, Vikas Verma, Jian TangICLR 2020 · 1,010 citations
Related papers
- Discrepancy-Aware Graph Mask Auto-EncoderZiyu Zheng, Yaming Yang, Ziyu Guan, Wei Zhao et al.KDD 2025
- Generative and Contrastive Paradigms Are Complementary for Graph Self-Supervised LearningYuxiang Wang, Xiao Yan, Chuang Hu, Quanqing Xu et al.ICDE 2024 · 11 citations
- Graph Positional Autoencoders as Self-supervised LearnersYang Liu, Deyu Bo, Wenxuan Cao, Yuan Fang et al.KDD 2025 · 2 citations
- Rethinking Graph Masked Autoencoders through Alignment and UniformityLiang Wang, Xiang Tao, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu et al.AAAI 2024 · 40 citations
- Heterogeneous Graph Masked AutoencodersYijun Tian, Kaiwen Dong, Chunhui Zhang, Chuxu Zhang et al.AAAI 2023 · 123 citations
