The Elicitation Game: Evaluating Capability Elicitation Techniques
Felix Hofstätter, Teun van der Weij, Jayden Teoh, Rada Djoneva, Henning Bartsch, Francis Rhys Ward
Abstract
Capability evaluations are required to understand and regulate AI systems that may be deployed or further developed. Therefore, it is important that evaluations provide an accurate estimation of an AI system's capabilities. However, in numerous cases, previously latent capabilities have been elicited from models, sometimes long after initial release. Accordingly, substantial efforts have been made to develop methods for eliciting latent capabilities from models. In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of capability elicitation techniques by intentionally training model organisms -language models with hidden capabilities that are revealed by a password. We introduce a novel method for training model organisms, based on circuit-breaking, which is more robust to elicitation techniques than standard password-locked models. We focus on elicitation techniques based on prompting and activation steering, and compare these to fine-tuning methods. Prompting techniques can elicit the actual capability of both password-locked and circuit-broken model organisms in the MCQA setting, while steering fails to do so. For a code-generation task, only finetuning can elicit the hidden capabilities of our novel model organism. Additionally, our results suggest that combining techniques improves elicitation. Still, if possible, fine-tuning should be the method of choice to improve the trustworthiness of capability evaluations. We publish our code and results at https://github.com/ Felhof/sandbagging-elicitation
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers10
- Deep Ignorance: Filtering Pretraining Data Builds Tamper-Resistant Safeguards into Open-Weight LLMsKyle O'Brien, Stephen Casper, Quentin Anthony, Tomek Korbak et al.ICLR 2026 · 59 citations
- Steering Evaluation-Aware Language Models To Act Like They Are DeployedTim Tian Hua, Andrew Qin, Samuel Marks, Neel NandaICLR 2026 · 38 citations
- Noise Injection Reveals Hidden Capabilities of Sandbagging Language ModelsCameron Tice, Philipp Alexander Kreer, Nathan Helm-Burger, Prithviraj Singh Shahani et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 24 citations
- Distillation Robustifies UnlearningBruce W. Lee, Addie Foote, Alex Infanger, Leni Shor et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
- CTRL-ALT-DECEIT Sabotage Evaluations for Automated AI R&DFrancis Ward, Teun van der Weij, Hanna Gábor, Sam Martin et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?Nicholas Carlini, Milad Nasr, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Matthew Jagielski et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 412 citations
Related papers
- Stress-Testing Capability Elicitation With Password-Locked ModelsRyan Greenblatt, Fabien Roger, Dmitrii Krasheninnikov, David KruegerNeurIPS 2024 · 47 citations
- Removing Sandbagging in LLMs by Training with Weak SupervisionEmil Ryd, Henning Bartsch, Julian Stastny, Joe Benton et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- AI Sandbagging: Language Models can Strategically Underperform on EvaluationsTeun van der Weij, Felix Hofstätter, Oliver Jaffe, Samuel F. Brown et al.ICLR 2025
- Quantifying Elicitation of Latent Capabilities in Language ModelsElizabeth Donoway, Hailey Joren, Arushi Somani, Henry Sleight et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Exploration Hacking: Can LLMs Learn to Resist RL Training?Yeonwoo Jang, Damon Falck, Joschka Cedric Braun, Nathalie Kirch et al.ICML 2026
