Quantifying Engagement with Citations on Wikipedia
Tiziano Piccardi, Miriam Redi, Giovanni Colavizza, Robert West
Abstract
Wikipedia is one of the most visited sites on the Web and a common source of information for many users. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia was not conceived as a source of original information, but as a gateway to secondary sources: according to Wikipedia’s guidelines, facts must be backed up by reliable sources that reflect the full spectrum of views on the topic. Although citations lie at the heart of Wikipedia, little is known about how users interact with them. To close this gap, we built client-side instrumentation for logging all interactions with links leading from English Wikipedia articles to cited references during one month, and conducted the first analysis of readers’ interactions with citations. We find that overall engagement with citations is low: about one in 300 page views results in a reference click (0.29% overall; 0.56% on desktop; 0.13% on mobile). Matched observational studies of the factors associated with reference clicking reveal that clicks occur more frequently on shorter pages and on pages of lower quality, suggesting that references are consulted more commonly when Wikipedia itself does not contain the information sought by the user. Moreover, we observe that recent content, open access sources, and references about life events (births, deaths, marriages, etc.) are particularly popular. Taken together, our findings deepen our understanding of Wikipedia’s role in a global information economy where reliability is ever less certain, and source attribution ever more vital.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- On the Value of Wikipedia as a Gateway to the WebTiziano Piccardi, Miriam Redi, Giovanni Colavizza, Robert WestWWW 2021 · 26 citations
- Longitudinal Assessment of Reference Quality on WikipediaAitolkyn Baigutanova, Jaehyeon Myung, Diego Sáez-Trumper, Ai-Jou Chou et al.WWW 2023 · 14 citations
- Detecting Miscitation on the Scholarly Web through LLM-Augmented Text-Rich Graph LearningHuidong Wu, Haojia Xiang, Jingtong Gao, Xiangyu Zhao et al.WWW 2026
Related papers
- A Deeper Investigation of the Importance of Wikipedia Links to Search Engine ResultsNicholas Vincent, Brent J. HechtCSCW 2021 · 38 citations
- Automatically Labeling Low Quality Content on Wikipedia By Leveraging Patterns in Editing BehaviorsSumit Asthana, Sabrina Tobar Thommel, Aaron Lee Halfaker, Nikola BanovicCSCW 2021 · 9 citations
- Quality Change: Norm or Exception? Measurement, Analysis and Detection of Quality Change in WikipediaParamita Das, Bhanu Prakash Reddy Guda, Sasi Bhushan Seelaboyina, Soumya Sarkar et al.CSCW 2022 · 8 citations
- WikiSQE: A Large-Scale Dataset for Sentence Quality Estimation in WikipediaKenichiro Ando, Satoshi Sekine, Mamoru KomachiAAAI 2024 · 5 citations
- Descartes: Generating Short Descriptions of Wikipedia ArticlesMarija Sakota, Maxime Peyrard, Robert WestWWW 2023 · 6 citations
