Aligning Requirement for Large Language Model's Code Generation
Zhao Tian, Junjie Chen
Abstract
Code generation refers to the automatic generation of source code based on a given programming specification, which has garnered significant attention particularly with the advancement of large language models (LLMs). However, due to the inherent complexity of real-world problems, the LLM-generated code often fails to fully align with the provided specification. While state-of-the-art agent-based techniques have been proposed to enhance LLM code generation, they overlook the critical issue of specification perception, resulting in persistent misalignment issues. Given that accurate perception of programming specifications serves as the foundation of the LLM-based code generation paradigm, ensuring specification alignment is particularly crucial. In this work, we draw on software requirements engineering to propose Specine, a novel specification alignment technique for LLM code generation. Its key idea is to identify misaligned input specifications, lift LLM-perceived specifications, and align them to enhance the code generation performance of LLMs. Our comprehensive experiments on four state-of-the-art LLMs across five challenging competitive benchmarks by comparing with ten state-of-the-art baselines, demonstrate the effectiveness of Specine. For example, Specine outperforms the most effective baseline, achieving an average improvement of 29.60% across all subjects in terms of Pass@1.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 98e070c6-1c73-4cde-aef9-25bb150cf1b8Builds on23
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- Teaching Large Language Models to Self-DebugXinyun Chen, Maxwell Lin, Nathanael Schärli, Denny ZhouICLR 2024 · 1,085 citations
- Studying the effect of AI Code Generators on Supporting Novice Learners in Introductory ProgrammingMajeed Kazemitabaar, Justin Chow, Carl Ka To Ma, Barbara J. Ericson et al.CHI 2023 · 348 citations
- Is Self-Repair a Silver Bullet for Code Generation?Theo X. Olausson, Jeevana Priya Inala, Chenglong Wang, Jianfeng Gao et al.ICLR 2024 · 195 citations
- Exploring and Unleashing the Power of Large Language Models in Automated Code TranslationZhen Yang, Fang Liu, Zhongxing Yu, Jacky Wai Keung et al.FSE 2024 · 72 citations
Related papers
- SpecGen: Automated Generation of Formal Program Specifications via Large Language ModelsLezhi Ma, Shangqing Liu, Yi Li, Xiaofei Xie et al.ICSE 2025 · 25 citations
- Fixing Large Language Models' Specification Misunderstanding for Better Code GenerationZhao Tian, Junjie Chen, Xiangyu ZhangICSE 2025 · 6 citations
- Reward-Free Code Alignment from Pretrained or Fine-Tuned LLM: Unpacking the Trade-offs for Code GenerationSanjeepan Sivapiran, Gias UddinFSE 2026
- Evaluating and Mitigating the Misguidance Effect of Buggy Code in LLM-Generated Unit TestsJunda Zhao, Shurui Zhou, Eldan CohenISSTA 2026 · 1 citation
- Do Large Language Models Pay Similar Attention Like Human Programmers When Generating Code?Bonan Kou, Shengmai Chen, Zhijie Wang, Lei Ma et al.FSE 2024 · 8 citations
