Exploring and Unleashing the Power of Large Language Models in Automated Code Translation
Zhen Yang, Fang Liu, Zhongxing Yu, Jacky Wai Keung, Jia Li, Shuo Liu, Yifan Hong, Xiaoxue Ma, Zhi Jin, Ge Li
Abstract
Code translation tools, namely transpilers, are developed for automatic source-to-source translation. Latest learning-based transpilers have shown impressive enhancement against rule-based counterparts in both translation accuracy and readability, owing to their task-specific pre-training on extensive monolingual corpora. Nevertheless, their current performance still remains unsatisfactory for practical deployment, and the associated training resources are also prohibitively expensive. Large Language Models (LLMs), pre-trained on huge amounts of human-written code/text, have shown remarkable performance in many code intelligence tasks due to their powerful generality, even without task-specific re-training/fine-tuning. Thus, LLMs can potentially circumvent the above limitations, but they have not been exhaustively explored yet. This paper investigates diverse LLMs and learning-based transpilers for automated code translation tasks, finding that: although certain LLMs have outperformed current transpilers, they still have some accuracy issues, where most of the failures are induced by a lack of comprehension of source programs (38.51%), missing clear instructions on I/O types in translation (14.94%), and ignoring discrepancies between source and target programs (41.38%). Enlightened by the above findings, we further propose UniTrans, a Unified code Translation framework, applicable to various LLMs, for unleashing their power in this field. Specifically, UniTrans first crafts a series of test cases for target programs with the assistance of source programs. Next, it harnesses the above auto-generated test cases to augment the code translation and then evaluate their correctness via execution. Afterward, UniTrans further (iteratively) repairs incorrectly translated programs prompted by test case execution results. Extensive experiments are conducted on six settings of translation datasets between Python, Java, and C++. Three recent LLMs of diverse sizes, including GPT-3.5 and LLaMA-13B/7B, are tested with UniTrans, and all achieve substantial improvements in terms of computational accuracy and exact match accuracy among almost all translation settings, showing the universal effectiveness of UniTrans in practice. CCS Concepts: • Software and its engineering → Genetic programming.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 3f6eac82-bb51-4b44-88d3-0fc412852b34Cited by top-tier papers33
- Rust for Embedded Systems: Current State and Open ProblemsAyushi Sharma, Shashank Sharma, Sai Ritvik Tanksalkar, Santiago Torres-Arias et al.CCS 2024 · 12 citations
- MatchFixAgent: Language-Agnostic Autonomous Repository-Level Code Translation Validation and RepairAli Reza Ibrahimzada, Brandon Paulsen, Reyhaneh Jabbarvand, Joey Dodds et al.ICML 2026 · 9 citations
- AlphaTrans: A Neuro-Symbolic Compositional Approach for Repository-Level Code Translation and ValidationAli Reza Ibrahimzada, Kaiyao Ke, Mrigank Pawagi, Muhammad Salman Abid et al.FSE 2025 · 8 citations
- INTERTRANS: Leveraging Transitive Intermediate Translations to Enhance LLM-Based Code TranslationMarcos Macedo, Yuan Tian, Pengyu Nie, Filipe Roseiro Côgo et al.ICSE 2025 · 7 citations
- A Pair Programming Framework for Code Generation via Multi-Plan Exploration and Feedback-Driven RefinementHuan Zhang, Wei Cheng, Yuhan Wu, Wei HuASE 2024 · 7 citations
Builds on17
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- Unsupervised Translation of Programming LanguagesBaptiste Rozière, Marie-Anne Lachaux, Lowik Chanussot, Guillaume LampleNeurIPS 2020 · 606 citations
- Automated Program Repair in the Era of Large Pre-trained Language ModelsChunqiu Steven Xia, Yuxiang Wei, Lingming ZhangICSE 2023 · 321 citations
- CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program SynthesisErik Nijkamp, Bo Pang, Hiroaki Hayashi, Lifu Tu et al.ICLR 2023 · 234 citations
- Less training, more repairing please: revisiting automated program repair via zero-shot learningChunqiu Steven Xia, Lingming ZhangFSE 2022 · 223 citations
Related papers
- Lost in Translation: A Study of Bugs Introduced by Large Language Models while Translating CodeRangeet Pan, Ali Reza Ibrahimzada, Rahul Krishna, Divya Sankar et al.ICSE 2024 · 96 citations
- ExeCoder: Empowering Large Language Models with Executability Representation for Code TranslationMinghua He, Yue Chen, Fangkai Yang, Pu Zhao et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- TransAgent: Enhancing LLM-Based Code Translation via Fine-Grained Execution AlignmentZhiqiang Yuan, Weitong Chen, Hanlin Wang, Xin Peng et al.FSE 2026 · 4 citations
- Evaluating and Improving ChatGPT for Unit Test GenerationZhiqiang Yuan, Mingwei Liu, Shiji Ding, Kaixin Wang et al.FSE 2024 · 89 citations
- Multilingual Code Co-evolution using Large Language ModelsJiyang Zhang, Pengyu Nie, Junyi Jessy Li, Milos GligoricFSE 2023 · 34 citations
