Redeeming intrinsic rewards via constrained optimization
Eric Chen, Zhang-Wei Hong, Joni Pajarinen, Pulkit Agrawal
Abstract
State-of-the-art reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms typically use random sampling (e.g., -greedy) for exploration, but this method fails on hard exploration tasks like Montezuma's Revenge. To address the challenge of exploration, prior works incentivize exploration by rewarding the agent when it visits novel states. Such intrinsic rewards (also called exploration bonus or curiosity) often lead to excellent performance on hard exploration tasks. However, on easy exploration tasks, the agent gets distracted by intrinsic rewards and performs unnecessary exploration even when sufficient task (also called extrinsic) reward is available. Consequently, such an overly curious agent performs worse than an agent trained with only task reward. Such inconsistency in performance across tasks prevents the widespread use of intrinsic rewards with RL algorithms. We propose a principled constrained optimization procedure called Extrinsic-Intrinsic Policy Optimization (EIPO) that automatically tunes the importance of the intrinsic reward: it suppresses the intrinsic reward when exploration is unnecessary and increases it when exploration is required. The results is superior exploration that does not require manual tuning in balancing the intrinsic reward against the task reward. Consistent performance gains across sixty-one ATARI games validate our claim. The code is available at https://github.com/Improbable-AI/eipo.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 98c26e5f-ac98-4a5b-85b8-663ee202312fCited by top-tier papers7
- TGRL: An Algorithm for Teacher Guided Reinforcement LearningIdan Shenfeld, Zhang-Wei Hong, Aviv Tamar, Pulkit AgrawalICML 2023 · 22 citations
- Random Latent Exploration for Deep Reinforcement LearningSrinath Mahankali, Zhang-Wei Hong, Ayush Sekhari, Alexander Rakhlin et al.ICML 2024 · 8 citations
- Breadcrumbs to the Goal: Supervised Goal Selection from Human-in-the-Loop FeedbackMarcel Torne Villasevil, Max Balsells, Zihan Wang, Samedh Desai et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
- Off-policy Reinforcement Learning with Model-based Exploration AugmentationLikun Wang, Xiangteng Zhang, Yinuo Wang, Guojian Zhan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Action-Dependent Optimality-Preserving Reward ShapingGrant C. Forbes, Jianxun Wang, Leonardo Villalobos-Arias, Arnav Jhala et al.ICML 2025
Builds on4
- Deep Reinforcement Learning at the Edge of the Statistical PrecipiceRishabh Agarwal, Max Schwarzer, Pablo Samuel Castro, Aaron C. Courville et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 1,067 citations
- Learning to Utilize Shaping Rewards: A New Approach of Reward ShapingYujing Hu, Weixun Wang, Hangtian Jia, Yixiang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 256 citations
- Beyond UCB: Optimal and Efficient Contextual Bandits with Regression OraclesDylan J. Foster, Alexander RakhlinICML 2020 · 241 citations
- What Can Learned Intrinsic Rewards Capture?Zeyu Zheng, Junhyuk Oh, Matteo Hessel, Zhongwen Xu et al.ICML 2020 · 87 citations
Related papers
- MaxInfoRL: Boosting exploration in reinforcement learning through information gain maximizationBhavya Sukhija, Stelian Coros, Andreas Krause, Pieter Abbeel et al.ICLR 2025
- Continuously Discovering Novel Strategies via Reward-Switching Policy OptimizationZihan Zhou, Wei Fu, Bingliang Zhang, Yi WuICLR 2022 · 34 citations
- Automatic Intrinsic Reward Shaping for Exploration in Deep Reinforcement LearningMingqi Yuan, Bo Li, Xin Jin, Wenjun ZengICML 2023 · 17 citations
- Successor-Predecessor Intrinsic ExplorationChangmin Yu, Neil Burgess, Maneesh Sahani, Samuel J. GershmanNeurIPS 2023 · 12 citations
- Going Beyond Heuristics by Imposing Policy Improvement as a ConstraintChi-Chang Lee, Zhang-Wei Hong, Pulkit AgrawalNeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations
