Error Slice Discovery via Manifold Compactness
Han Yu, Hao Zou, Jiashuo Liu, Renzhe Xu, Yue He, Xingxuan Zhang, Peng Cui
Abstract
Despite the great performance of deep learning models in many areas, they still make mistakes and underperform on certain subsets of data, i.e. error slices. Given a trained model, it is important to identify its semantically coherent error slices that are easy to interpret, which is referred to as the error slice discovery problem. However, there is no proper metric of slice coherence without relying on extra information like predefined slice labels. Current evaluation of slice coherence requires access to predefined slices formulated by metadata like attributes or subclasses. Its validity heavily relies on the quality and abundance of metadata, where some possible patterns could be ignored. Besides, current algorithms cannot directly incorporate the constraint of coherence into their optimization objective due to absence of an explicit coherence metric, which could potentially hinder their effectiveness. In this paper, we propose manifold compactness, a coherence metric without reliance on extra information by incorporating the data geometry property into its design, and experiments on typical datasets empirically validate the rationality of the metric. Then we develop Manifold Compactness based error Slice Discovery (MCSD), a novel algorithm that directly treats risk and coherence as the optimization objective, and is flexible to be applied to models of various tasks. Extensive experiments on the benchmark and case studies on other typical datasets demonstrate the superiority of MCSD.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 97078483-9cdc-455f-b4c2-1d328686e4c5Cited by top-tier papers2
- Generating Risky Samples with Conformity Constraints via Diffusion ModelsHan Yu, Hao Zou, Xingxuan Zhang, Zhengyi Wang et al.AAAI 2026
- CB-SLICE: Concept-Based Interpretable Error Slice DiscoveryYael Konforti, Mateo Espinosa Zarlenga, Elaf Almahmoud, Mateja JamnikICML 2026
Builds on34
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion ModelsRobin Rombach, Andreas Blattmann, Dominik Lorenz, Patrick Esser et al.CVPR 2022 · 13,123 citations
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)David Krueger, Ethan Caballero, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, Amy Zhang et al.ICML 2021 · 1,163 citations
- Domain Generalization with MixStyleKaiyang Zhou, Yongxin Yang, Yu Qiao, Tao XiangICLR 2021 · 986 citations
Related papers
- Error Discovery By Clustering Influence EmbeddingsFulton Wang, Julius Adebayo, Sarah Tan, Diego Garcia-Olano et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10 citations
- What Is Wrong with My Model? Identifying Systematic Problems with Semantic Data SlicingChenyang Yang, Yining Hong, Grace A. Lewis, Tongshuang Wu et al.ASE 2024 · 2 citations
- Domino: Discovering Systematic Errors with Cross-Modal EmbeddingsSabri Eyuboglu, Maya Varma, Khaled Kamal Saab, Jean-Benoit Delbrouck et al.ICLR 2022 · 178 citations
- HiBug2: Efficient and Interpretable Error Slice Discovery for Comprehensive Model DebuggingMuxi Chen, Chenchen Zhao, Qiang XuICLR 2025
- Slicing Mutual Information Generalization Bounds for Neural NetworksKimia Nadjahi, Kristjan H. Greenewald, Rickard Brüel Gabrielsson, Justin SolomonICML 2024 · 5 citations
