The Complexity of Learning Sparse Superposed Features with Feedback
Akash Kumar
Abstract
The success of deep networks is crucially attributed to their ability to capture latent features within a representation space. In this work, we investigate whether the underlying learned features of a model can be efficiently retrieved through feedback from an agent, such as a large language model (LLM), in the form of relative triplet comparisons. These features may represent various constructs, including dictionaries in LLMs or a covariance matrix of Mahalanobis distances. We analyze the feedback complexity associated with learning a feature matrix in sparse settings. Our results establish tight bounds when the agent is permitted to construct activations and demonstrate strong upper bounds in sparse scenarios when the agent's feedback is limited to distributional information. We validate our theoretical findings through experiments 1 on two distinct applications: feature recovery from Recursive Feature Machines and dictionary extraction from sparse autoencoders trained on Large Language Models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on10
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Tensor Programs IV: Feature Learning in Infinite-Width Neural NetworksGreg Yang, Edward J. HuICML 2021 · 242 citations
- High-dimensional Asymptotics of Feature Learning: How One Gradient Step Improves the RepresentationJimmy Ba, Murat A. Erdogdu, Taiji Suzuki, Zhichao Wang et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 173 citations
- Self-Consistent Dynamical Field Theory of Kernel Evolution in Wide Neural NetworksBlake Bordelon, Cengiz PehlevanNeurIPS 2022 · 140 citations
- Measuring Progress in Dictionary Learning for Language Model Interpretability with Board Game ModelsAdam Karvonen, Benjamin Wright, Can Rager, Rico Angell et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 66 citations
Related papers
- Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencodersLeo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh et al.ICLR 2025 · 10 citations
- Sparse Autoencoders Trained on the Same Data Learn Different FeaturesGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 96 citations
- Inference-Time Decomposition of Activations (ITDA): A Scalable Approach to Interpreting Large Language ModelsPatrick Leask, Neel Nanda, Noura Al MoubayedICML 2025
- Dimensional Collapse in Transformer Attention Outputs: A Challenge for Sparse Dictionary LearningJunxuan Wang, Xuyang Ge, Wentao Shu, Zhengfu He et al.ICML 2026 · 5 citations
- LinguaLens: Towards Interpreting Linguistic Mechanisms of Large Language Models via Sparse Auto-EncoderYi Jing, Zijun Yao, Hongzhu Guo, Lingxu Ran et al.EMNLP 2025 · 7 citations
