Measuring Progress in Dictionary Learning for Language Model Interpretability with Board Game Models
Adam Karvonen, Benjamin Wright, Can Rager, Rico Angell, Jannik Brinkmann, Logan Smith, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, David Bau, Samuel Marks
Abstract
What latent features are encoded in language model (LM) representations? Recent work on training sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to disentangle interpretable features in LM representations has shown significant promise. However, evaluating the quality of these SAEs is difficult because we lack a ground-truth collection of interpretable features that we expect good SAEs to recover. We thus propose to measure progress in interpretable dictionary learning by working in the setting of LMs trained on chess and Othello transcripts. These settings carry natural collections of interpretable features -- for example,"there is a knight on F3"-- which we leverage into metrics for SAE quality. To guide progress in interpretable dictionary learning, we introduce a new SAE training technique, , which improves performance on prior unsupervised metrics as well as our new metrics.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers18
- A is for Absorption: Studying Feature Splitting and Absorption in Sparse AutoencodersDavid Chanin, James Wilken-Smith, Tomás Dulka, Hardik Bhatnagar et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 168 citations
- Automated Interpretability Metrics Do Not Distinguish Trained and Random TransformersThomas Heap, Tim Lawson, Lucy Farnik, Laurence AitchisonICLR 2026 · 32 citations
- I Predict Therefore I Am: Is Next Token Prediction Enough to Learn Human-Interpretable Concepts from Data?Yuhang Liu, Dong Gong, Yichao Cai, Erdun Gao et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Feature Extraction and Steering for Enhanced Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsZihao Li, Xu Wang, Yuzhe Yang, Ziyu Yao et al.EMNLP 2025 · 14 citations
- Does Higher Interpretability Imply Better Utility? A Pairwise Analysis on Sparse AutoencodersXu Wang, Yan Hu, Benyou Wang, Difan ZouICLR 2026 · 9 citations
Builds on6
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language ModelsKiho Park, Yo Joong Choe, Victor VeitchICML 2024 · 461 citations
- Emergent World Representations: Exploring a Sequence Model Trained on a Synthetic TaskKenneth Li, Aspen K. Hopkins, David Bau, Fernanda B. Viégas et al.ICLR 2023 · 60 citations
- Scaling and evaluating sparse autoencodersLeo Gao, Tom Dupré la Tour, Henk Tillman, Gabriel Goh et al.ICLR 2025 · 10 citations
- Towards Principled Evaluations of Sparse Autoencoders for Interpretability and ControlAleksandar Makelov, Georg Lange, Neel NandaICLR 2025
Related papers
- Temporal Sparse Autoencoders: Leveraging the Sequential Nature of Language for InterpretabilityUsha Bhalla, Alex Oesterling, Claudio Mayrink Verdun, Himabindu Lakkaraju et al.ICLR 2026 · 18 citations
- SAEBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Sparse Autoencoders in Language Model InterpretabilityAdam Karvonen, Can Rager, Johnny Lin, Curt Tigges et al.ICML 2025
- Rethinking Evaluation of Sparse Autoencoders through the Representation of Polysemous WordsGouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka MatsuoICLR 2025
- Evaluating SAE interpretability without generating explanationsGonçalo Paulo, Nora BelroseICLR 2026 · 2 citations
- Identifying Functionally Important Features with End-to-End Sparse Dictionary LearningDan Braun, Jordan Taylor, Nicholas Goldowsky-Dill, Lee SharkeyNeurIPS 2024 · 81 citations
