Buffer layers for Test-Time Adaptation
Hyeongyu Kim, Geonhui Han, Dosik Hwang
Abstract
In recent advancements in Test Time Adaptation (TTA), most existing methodologies focus on updating normalization layers to adapt to the test domain. However, the reliance on normalization-based adaptation presents key challenges. First, normalization layers such as Batch Normalization (BN) are highly sensitive to small batch sizes, leading to unstable and inaccurate statistics. Moreover, normalization-based adaptation is inherently constrained by the structure of the pre-trained model, as it relies on training-time statistics that may not generalize well to unseen domains. These issues limit the effectiveness of normalization-based TTA approaches, especially under significant domain shift. In this paper, we introduce a novel paradigm based on the concept of a Buffer layer, which addresses the fundamental limitations of normalization layer updates. Unlike existing methods that modify the core parameters of the model, our approach preserves the integrity of the pre-trained backbone, inherently mitigating the risk of catastrophic forgetting during online adaptation. Through comprehensive experimentation, we demonstrate that our approach not only outperforms traditional methods in mitigating domain shift and enhancing model robustness, but also exhibits strong resilience to forgetting. Furthermore, our Buffer layer is modular and can be seamlessly integrated into nearly all existing TTA frameworks, resulting in consistent performance improvements across various architectures. These findings validate the effectiveness and versatility of the proposed solution in real-world domain adaptation scenarios. The code is available at https://github.com/hyeongyu-kim/Buffer_TTA.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Tempora: Characterising the Time-Contingent Utility of Online Test-Time AdaptationSudarshan Sreeram, Young D. Kwon, Cecilia MascoloICML 2026 · 1 citation
- CD-Buffer: Complementary Dual-Buffer Framework for Test-Time Adaptation in Adverse Weather Object DetectionYoungjun Song, Hyeongyu Kim, Dosik HwangCVPR 2026 · 1 citation
- AcTTA: Rethinking Test-Time Adaptation via Dynamic ActivationHyeongyu Kim, Geonhui Han, Dosik HwangCVPR 2026
Builds on18
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Tent: Fully Test-Time Adaptation by Entropy MinimizationDequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu, Bruno A. Olshausen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,731 citations
- MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and AugmentationMarvin Zhang, Sergey Levine, Chelsea FinnNeurIPS 2022 · 595 citations
- Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without ForgettingShuaicheng Niu, Jiaxiang Wu, Yifan Zhang, Yaofo Chen et al.ICML 2022 · 579 citations
- Continual Test-Time Domain AdaptationQin Wang, Olga Fink, Luc Van Gool, Dengxin DaiCVPR 2022 · 383 citations
Related papers
- TTN: A Domain-Shift Aware Batch Normalization in Test-Time AdaptationHyesu Lim, Byeonggeun Kim, Jaegul Choo, Sungha ChoiICLR 2023 · 21 citations
- What, How, and When Should Object Detectors Update in Continually Changing Test Domains?Jayeon Yoo, Dongkwan Lee, Inseop Chung, Donghyun Kim et al.CVPR 2024 · 10 citations
- Un-Mixing Test-Time Normalization Statistics: Combatting Label Temporal CorrelationDevavrat Tomar, Guillaume Vray, Jean-Philippe Thiran, Behzad BozorgtabarICLR 2024 · 9 citations
- Unraveling Batch Normalization for Realistic Test-Time AdaptationZixian Su, Jingwei Guo, Kai Yao, Xi Yang et al.AAAI 2024 · 14 citations
- MedBN: Robust Test-Time Adaptation against Malicious Test SamplesHyejin Park, Jeongyeon Hwang, Sunung Mun, Sangdon Park et al.CVPR 2024 · 1 citation
