AcTTA: Rethinking Test-Time Adaptation via Dynamic Activation
Hyeongyu Kim, Geonhui Han, Dosik Hwang
Abstract
Test-time adaptation (TTA) aims to mitigate performance degradation under distribution shifts by updating model parameters during inference. Existing approaches have primarily framed adaptation around affine modulation, focusing on recalibrating normalization layers. This perspective, while effective, overlooks another influential component in representation dynamics: the activation function.
We revisit this overlooked space and propose AcTTA, an activation-aware framework that reinterprets conventional activation functions from a learnable perspective and updates them adaptively at test time. AcTTA reformulates conventional activation functions (e.g., ReLU, GELU) into parameterized forms that shift their response threshold and modulate gradient sensitivity, enabling the network to adjust activation behavior under domain shifts. This functional reparameterization enables continuous adjustment of activation behavior without modifying network weights or requiring source data. Despite its simplicity, AcTTA achieves robust and stable adaptation across diverse corruptions. Across CIFAR10-C, CIFAR100-C, and ImageNet-C, AcTTA consistently surpasses normalization-based TTA methods. Our findings highlight activation adaptation as a compact and effective route toward domain-shift-robust test-time learning, broadening the prevailing affine-centric view of adaptation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1a441f99-6c76-4427-9580-a542e301ce2aBuilds on13
- The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution GeneralizationDan Hendrycks, Steven Basart, Norman Mu, Saurav Kadavath et al.ICCV 2021 · 2,294 citations
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- Tent: Fully Test-Time Adaptation by Entropy MinimizationDequan Wang, Evan Shelhamer, Shaoteng Liu, Bruno A. Olshausen et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,731 citations
- Test-Time Training with Self-Supervision for Generalization under Distribution ShiftsYu Sun, Xiaolong Wang, Zhuang Liu, John Miller et al.ICML 2020 · 1,220 citations
- Efficient Test-Time Model Adaptation without ForgettingShuaicheng Niu, Jiaxiang Wu, Yifan Zhang, Yaofo Chen et al.ICML 2022 · 579 citations
Related papers
- Buffer layers for Test-Time AdaptationHyeongyu Kim, Geonhui Han, Dosik HwangNeurIPS 2025 · 6 citations
- A Layer Selection Approach to Test Time AdaptationSabyasachi Sahoo, Mostafa ElAraby, Jonas Ngnawé, Yann Batiste Pequignot et al.AAAI 2025 · 6 citations
- ActMAD: Activation Matching to Align Distributions for Test-Time-TrainingMuhammad Jehanzeb Mirza, Pol Jané-Soneira, Wei Lin, Mateusz Kozinski et al.CVPR 2023
- Efficient Test-time Adaptive Object Detection via Sensitivity-Guided PruningKunyu Wang, Xueyang Fu, Xin Lu, Chengjie Ge et al.CVPR 2025
- What, How, and When Should Object Detectors Update in Continually Changing Test Domains?Jayeon Yoo, Dongkwan Lee, Inseop Chung, Donghyun Kim et al.CVPR 2024 · 10 citations
