LatticeBox: A Hardware-Software Co-Designed Framework for Scalable and Low-Latency Compartmentalization
Zhanpeng Liu, Chenyang Li, Wende Tan, Yuan Li, Xinhui Han, Xi Cao, Yong Xie, Chao Zhang
Abstract
Modern software systems increasingly rely on compartmentalization to isolate untrusted or potentially vulnerable components, such as third-party drivers and JIT-compiled code. However, existing hardware isolation techniques suffer from scalability constraints, high switching latency, and inadequate security guarantees. In particular, permission-changing instructions used by some compartmentalization technology, such as Intel MPK’s WRPKRU, can be exploited by untrusted code, which complicates the secure deployment process. In this paper, we introduce LatticeBox, a hardware-software co-designed framework that addresses these limitations using a lattice-based access control model. LatticeBox encodes permissions and memory regions as compact, hierarchical N-bit vectors. This design enables a hardware architecture that reduces domain-switching latency to a single CPU cycle and inherently prevents misuse of permission-switching instructions. Additionally, LatticeBox employs a customized instruction (lp_land) to enforce strict cross-domain control-flow integrity, effectively preventing unauthorized indirect function calls. We implement LatticeBox on a RISC-V BOOM core and evaluate it using both microbenchmarks and real-world applications, including WebAssembly runtimes and Linux kernel modules. Our results show that LatticeBox achieves domain switching up to 180× faster than Intel MPK while supporting fine-grained, scalable isolation. Evaluation on real-world workloads demonstrates only a modest performance impact, with only 2% slowdown for enhanced WebAssembly runtimes and just 3% lower throughput for ApacheBench running isolated Linux kernel modules.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on21
- ERIM: Secure, Efficient In-process Isolation with Protection Keys (MPK)Anjo Vahldiek-Oberwagner, Eslam Elnikety, Nuno O. Duarte, Michael Sammler et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 247 citations
- Firecracker: Lightweight Virtualization for Serverless ApplicationsAlexandru Agache, Marc Brooker, Alexandra Iordache, Anthony Liguori et al.NSDI 2020 · 197 citations
- SEIMI: Efficient and Secure SMAP-Enabled Intra-process Memory IsolationZhe Wang, Chenggang Wu, Mengyao Xie, Yinqian Zhang et al.S&P 2020 · 37 citations
- Going beyond the Limits of SFI: Flexible and Secure Hardware-Assisted In-Process Isolation with HFIShravan Narayan, Tal Garfinkel, Mohammadkazem Taram, Joey Rudek et al.ASPLOS 2023 · 27 citations
- VDom: Fast and Unlimited Virtual Domains on Multiple ArchitecturesZiqi Yuan, Siyu Hong, Rui Chang, Yajin Zhou et al.ASPLOS 2023 · 19 citations
Related papers
- Donky: Domain Keys - Efficient In-Process Isolation for RISC-V and x86David Schrammel, Samuel Weiser, Stefan Steinegger, Martin Schwarzl et al.USENIX Security 2020
- BULKHEAD: Secure, Scalable, and Efficient Kernel Compartmentalization with PKSYinggang Guo, Zicheng Wang, Weiheng Bai, Qingkai Zeng et al.NDSS 2025
- SecureCells: A Secure Compartmentalized ArchitectureAtri Bhattacharyya, Florian Hofhammer, Yuanlong Li, Siddharth Gupta et al.S&P 2023
- PANIC: PAN-assisted Intra-process Memory Isolation on ARMJiali Xu, Mengyao Xie, Chenggang Wu, Yinqian Zhang et al.CCS 2023 · 11 citations
- ISA-Grid: Architecture of Fine-grained Privilege Control for Instructions and RegistersShulin Fan, Zhichao Hua, Yubin Xia, Haibo Chen et al.ISCA 2023 · 9 citations
