Thompson Sampling via Fine-Tuning of LLMs
Nicolas Menet, Aleksandar Terzic, Michael Hersche, Andreas Krause, Abbas Rahimi
Abstract
Bayesian optimization in large unstructured discrete spaces is often hindered by the computational cost of maximizing acquisition functions due to the absence of gradients. We propose a scalable alternative based on Thompson sampling that eliminates the need for acquisition function maximization by directly parameterizing the probability that a candidate yields the maximum reward. Our approach, Thompson Sampling via Fine-Tuning (TOSFIT), leverages the prior knowledge embedded in prompt-conditioned large language models, and incrementally adapts them toward the posterior. Theoretically, we derive a novel regret bound for a variational formulation of Thompson Sampling that matches the strong guarantees of its standard counterpart. Our analysis reveals the critical role of careful adaptation to the posterior probability of maximality-a principle that underpins our TOSFIT algorithm. Empirically, we validate our method on three diverse tasks: FAQ response refinement, thermally stable protein search, and quantum circuit design. Within a collection of methods covering in-context Bayesian optimization, reinforcement learning, and evolutionary search, TOSFIT exhibits both state-of-the-art sample efficiency and computational efficiency. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 943b7d1d-8f8e-4dca-932e-263edf5495bdBuilds on7
- More Than a Toy: Random Matrix Models Predict How Real-World Neural Representations GeneralizeAlexander Wei, Wei Hu, Jacob SteinhardtICML 2022 · 90 citations
- Improving black-box optimization in VAE latent space using decoder uncertaintyPascal Notin, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Yarin GalNeurIPS 2021 · 76 citations
- Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE-Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMsArash Ahmadian, Chris Cremer, Matthias Gallé, Marzieh Fadaee et al.ACL 2024 · 20 citations
- Probabilistic Inference in Reinforcement Learning Done RightJean Tarbouriech, Tor Lattimore, Brendan O'DonoghueNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Variational Bayesian Optimistic SamplingBrendan O'Donoghue, Tor LattimoreNeurIPS 2021 · 8 citations
Related papers
- FunBO: Discovering Acquisition Functions for Bayesian Optimization with FunSearchVirginia Aglietti, Ira Ktena, Jessica Schrouff, Eleni Sgouritsa et al.ICML 2025
- A Sober Look at LLMs for Material Discovery: Are They Actually Good for Bayesian Optimization Over Molecules?Agustinus Kristiadi, Felix Strieth-Kalthoff, Marta Skreta, Pascal Poupart et al.ICML 2024 · 55 citations
- Steering Generative Models with Experimental Data for Protein Fitness OptimizationJason Yang, Wenda Chu, Daniel Khalil, Raul Astudillo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- BOTS: A Unified Framework for Bayesian Online Task Selection in LLM Reinforcement FinetuningQianli Shen, Daoyuan Chen, Yilun Huang, Zhenqing Ling et al.ICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- Scaling Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization with Large Language ModelsYimeng Zeng, Natalie Maus, Haydn Thomas Jones, Jeffrey Tao et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
